Jump to content

Chicago916

Members
  • Posts

    176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chicago916

  1. 3 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

    With all due respect, describing it that way makes it seem like there's a predetermined outcome. If your take is that the snow swath will end up south of what the 12z Euro op is showing, that's fine. There's no such thing as a model moving toward a consensus. Plus, the GEFS mean is solidly north of the GFS. And the amount of spread in the solutions means there isn't a consensus anyway.

     

    Is there a particular model of choice that is best at depicting dynamic cooling?

  2. 13 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

    Bump north on 18z EPS. Still lots of spread on the individual members, but added several farther north/west and stronger solutions.

    Edit: Attached are the snow mean and member low locations.

    Edit 2: Now with individual member snowfall.

    2e6ccdeaa34c81b9d0cd0e61f67cf2b4.jpg



    28a935d676a8b539a1276083d2e41c62.jpgf21b0f29c358ba489aed00799c15dcc6.jpg

    295edf524a5e0a551222eaa51cad1c38.jpgae9f08d5f5388c25ec3af88df8343d1b.jpg

    Quite a few big dogs. Interesting to see that with a more ENE movement and not a NE moving low.

    • Like 1
  3. 13 minutes ago, mimillman said:

    Riding a razors edge in terms of southern extent here, but these higher returns are good

    Going to be interesting if the cutoff is near us. Might get 6"+ while the metro gets much less. Oof more like Northern burbs into Lake county get it good while central Cook and South are unlucky. 

×
×
  • Create New...