Jump to content

WinterWxLuvr

Members
  • Posts

    29,279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WinterWxLuvr

  1. I would agree here. But I’m also a believer that data is best collected where humans actually exist. A huge piece to this puzzle is gonna be the actual longitude of the ns energy that dives in. That piece is currently in a place that might as well be the moon.
  2. Yeah, on the photos I thought they meant from Webb. The photos from Juno are mesmerizing.
  3. Are we hammered yet? Crushed? Beatdown? Lol. Good luck brother. I probably won’t be here. Unless … my morning meditation brings this low to Hampton. Warning to the majority… I’m trying to will this thing inland. Beware!!!
  4. What is it with posters who put Center in their name? It’s like a brand or something.
  5. That’s what’s said, but not sure I agree. I also think we tend to overlook changes that occur to data over time. What was projected at 12 hours will always differ at some level from what actually occurs. Then new data is taken and so on. For me, and just an opinion, it’s much easier to determine what the actually reality is in respect to whatever feature you’re sampling if that feature is over land and not 500 miles out in the pacific.
  6. I’m on this train. Either way I’ll be where it’s snowing. I’ll either be here or at the house in wv.
  7. The only Jupiter pics I could find are from Juno
  8. BTW, I think caution should be used when looking at precip maps on TT. It jus showed rain in Va with temps in the 20’s and thickness at 528. Lol
  9. @stormtracker take comfort in the fact that the changes we need are not huge. They are timing and differences possibly in less than 100 or so miles. Models aren’t gonna be able to nail down this many pieces at this range. Like @psuhoffmansaid, this is super complicated
  10. Rest up. If anything it shows that changes are likely and tgat they don’t have to be huge.
  11. This has nothing to do with latitude and everything to do with longitude
×
×
  • Create New...