Jump to content

WinterWxLuvr

Members
  • Posts

    29,279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WinterWxLuvr

  1. I’m pretty sure that holding energy in the sw is a pretty common model bias. It used to be especially true of the euro.
  2. The two pieces have to come in sync. That obviously did not happen. The sw piece currently sits at 160w long, 55n lat. The northern piece as far as I can tell resides somewhere in the vicinity of the Alaska/Yukon border. It also appears highly influenced by disturbances rotating around the PV. I’m sure the models have all of those pieces figured out perfectly at this point.
  3. I think it’s better. It’s deeper than the gfs and both parts northern and southern are farther west. Still could use better alignment and timing.
  4. CMC still needs to be 75-100 miles farther west. Deeper too while we are at it.
  5. The eps was not much of a change. On low positions one could argue worse.
  6. I agree that it’s northern stream dominant but I’d call it more if a late A than a B. But I’ll bow out of this discussion and defer to those who know more than I.
  7. IMO, that energy in the sw can’t lag behind. It has to match the timing of the ns dropping in. It would also help if it was deeper. And all of it a little further west. If I can think of anything else to add to the wish list, I’ll edit.
  8. For me, I liked seeing this. All still comes down to timing but this is nice
  9. I don’t see this at all. Hopefully someone can explain how this is a Miller B
  10. I agree. Look at the front side of the western ridge. It’s further west and almost vertical. If that energy in the sw had been a little deeper it would have been a much bigger hit IMO.
  11. The trough is further west. Would think better but will have to wait
  12. I don’t see how this is a Miller B. Seems like a late developing A to me. Can anybody explain?
  13. Can you just feel the Euro lurking? Many here can I’m sure, and can relate to exactly what I’m thinking.
×
×
  • Create New...