Jump to content

Ed, snow and hurricane fan

Members
  • Posts

    2,133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ed, snow and hurricane fan

  1. 19 minutes ago, GaWx said:

    0Z Euro: similar track to 12Z but stronger with it coming back into CHS at 986 mb vs 989 on 12Z; biblical rainfall amts of 20-24” mainly over ~72 hr period SAV-CHS and inland to 50 miles Lowcountry

    Scrolling, near the 21.57 inch 6 day rainfall I see amounts as high as 30.83 inches.  The only good thing if FFS were correct is S. South Carolina, where the heaviest 6 day totals occurs have offshore winds for much of the storm, or the flooding rivers and streams at least won't be flowing into bays with water levels elevated by onshore flow.  That is a major disaster if it verifies.

     

    EDIT TO ADD: I quoted a post about the Euro w/ a GFS forecast image.  It is late and I should go to bed soon.

    30inches.png

  2. 37 minutes ago, Normandy said:

    Think they might need to pull the trigger soon.  Lots of low level turning now and A good deal south of Cuba too. 

    I see the turning down between Cuba and Jamaica near the Caymans.  Bit I can also convince myself there is loose turning centered on the S coast of Cuba or just inland.  If PTC 4 looks like this tomorrow, I don't think they'll upfrade without either a defined recon center of satellite being very obvious.  Watches and warnings already up with PTC advisories.

  3. 1 minute ago, CurlyHeadBarrett said:

    What do you mean?

    PTC 4 appeared in the modeling with some Euro ensembles developing a storm and the number of ensembles developing a TC increased every week.  PTC 4 didn't develop as quickly as some of those ensembles suggested, but for MDR development, at least for PTC 4, some Euro ensemble members seeing it, with an increase in members, until other models caught on, is how the potential tropical development was first seen.

    Cyclone 5, Invest 98L, maybe.  Maybe not.

    • Like 1
  4. New GFS is Tampa Bay area, which, judging by Charlie and Ian, means down towards Naples or Port Charlotte, and then slowing to a crawl as it passes offshore of the OBX and erodes the beaches before the second half of August through early October.

    OBX_dune_destroyer.png

  5. 18Z GEFS have fewer stalls on the Gulf Coast, although I see some perturbations that get off the coast SEUSA, then start meandering or even turning back in at 6 days.

     

    EDIT TO ADD:  Some interesting members at 6 days turning back in from the Atlantic towards the Mid Atlantic.

  6. 22 minutes ago, wthrmn654 said:

    just was looking at the meso models for down south areas, nam, rgem are west coast scrapers for florida, then north east curve... the fv3- Hi res interstingly takes it on the eastern side of florida in atlantic, scrapping or just offshore. 

    The Canadian Regional is close to the end of its modeled area, and I recall the 3 km NAM spun some Gulf storm down below 700 mb.  The higher resolution non-global models are generally not used.  There are high res hurricane models, but they aren't very accurate until a well defined center is formed.

     

    Tweets don't embed for me any longer here so I'm pasting the actual Tweet.

     
     
     
     
     
    AXM7PpSG_bigger.jpg
     
    PSA for folks who track the tropics: hurricane models (like HAFS or HWRF) aren't really designed to be used for invests. We do our tuning and evaluation on storms that have already reached TD+. So the biases are probably larger and more unpredictable at this stage.
    • Thanks 1
  7. 3 minutes ago, wthrmn654 said:

    but wait throw in a curveball, the hurricane models are running right now and so far the HAFS-B take it into he gulf and looks like its got its sites on far left part of Florida towards the LA border.. 

    Dr. Andy Hazelton, one of the HAFS team leaders at HRD has a pinned tweet about the HAFS before a center has formed.  he says don't trust it.  I'll feel better tomorrow evenings (morning in Europe) models tomorrow, and even better Saturday evening/Sunday morning, as aircraft first sample around the storm tomorrow and then locate a center Saturday..

  8. 3 minutes ago, wthrmn654 said:

    2024al97_mpsatwnd_202408011500_swhr.gif

    That shows the issue with the statistical intensity model.  It initializes with a fairly well organized surface low, which doesn't reflect the reality of a low level vorticity in mountainous terrain.  Still useful for seeing the likely rate of strengthening once an organized center emerges over water. 

  9. 15 minutes ago, wthrmn654 said:

    12z total precip runs for gfs,cmc,and icon to kinda paint the idea of where they think there heading. 

    they all kinda have the same idea at this point, which is saying a lot compared to what we had been seeing. 

    but with that in mind, any small changes will very likely alter things drastically

    gfs_apcpn_eus_41.pnggem_apcpn_eus_40.pngicon_apcpn_eus_60.png

    That is pretty useful, it can be used as a pseudo ensemble, and suggests a Florida Big Bend to near OBX track,

  10. 1 minute ago, wthrmn654 said:

    was trying to do 1 gif of the whole thing obviously lol unless theres a way im not aware of

    I used to be a donating member here, which increases file size limits.  If I make a whole season w/o a suspension I may donate again.

    • Like 1
  11. WxMan57 currently buys a system moving N just off W Coast of Florida.  He even has expected wind impacts, but notes without an organized center for models to work with, uncertainty in his forecast is higher than he'd like.

     

    Eyeball mean of GFS ensembles suggests Florida Big Bend but landfall location seems to be highly dependent on where the center actually forms.

    GEFS_01Aug_12Z.png

    • Thanks 1
  12. Dr. Hazelton on Twitter notes the 'squished spider' model tracks, suggesting uncertain steering.  Florida Panhandle or W. Peninsula seems most likely impact point, with a potential second landfall or near miss near OBX and marine effects New England.  As noted on other weatherboards, SSTs and OHC in the E. Gulf is higher than normal, so time over water could make a large difference in intensity.  I would note GFS ensembles make it clear the main determinant of where 97L goes in the next 5 days is where it forms.  As I noted, LLC over mountains of DR, vigorous convection N of G. Antilles, and mid level vorticity SE of low level vorticity, or where it forms is very much in doubt.

    1 minute ago, wthrmn654 said:

    13662383.gif

    You could have edited the previous post or delete the prior post.  The every 2 minute latest hour from the model stuff tends to clutter the board.

     

    • Like 2
  13. 58 minutes ago, cptcatz said:

    Is it me or is it it trying to form a center of rotation here to the north of Hispaniola? If it does spin something up there, that would put it a good bit north of modeling and have it over hot water for much longer than anticipated. 

    Screenshot_20240801_105248_Chrome.jpg

    CIMMS product shows low level vort over the Dominican Republic, where the mountains should keep development in check, and 500 mb vort to the SE of the low level vort, a bit S of the Mona Channel.  A new vortmax could form N of the GA, or maybe under the midlevel vort max, but honestly, I think it is too early to call where the center develops.  Excluding the extreme outliers of the ensembles, I think anywhere ensembles show a possible landfall is in play.

  14. Interesting that both GFS ensembles and Euro ensembles have a fair number of members still near the coast or offshore SEUSA or in the Gulf at 10 days.  The models seem to have a lot of stalled or looping members, that increases flooding risk.  

  15. 18 minutes ago, Windspeed said:

    Welp, there it is... The GFS 00Z OP just showed what a hypothetical TC in the EGOM might do if it loops far enough offshore as opposed to over the coast. Not even going to post it. No need. I'm sure you've all seen it by now anyway.

    Expect large variations in output intensity from these operational runs from here on out as any slight deviation in TCG position and steering pattern is going to either park the system near-to-over land or offshore, which, of course has huge intensity implications. It's all still very much beyond realistic modeling range and most likely flat wrong. We have no idea what we're going to be dealing with in 4-5 days other than lots of rain for someone.

    At any rate, I was half expecting one of these OPs to eventually go nuts if that looping pattern kept showing up. Just please realize these outputs of an intense TC may come and go every so often over the next couple of days, perhaps more, as long as a loop/stall keeps getting simulated, and don't let them get to your head! lol...

    The part with extreme rainfall somewhere along the Eastern half of the Gulf Coast seems very possible.  I suspect many smaller cities right on the Gulf could handle Harvey-esque rain, but Harvey like rain in New Orleans or Tampa could produce Harvey like rains.  I think a 3 day stall is a fairly low possibility.  GEFS through 6 days are mostly above 1000 mb.

  16.   

    Just now, Ed, snow and hurricane fan said:

    I'm a little weenie on New England/New York hurricanes, both of my parents remembered 1938 quite well, but a strong tropical storm with the Bermuda-Azores ridge building back in, well, not 1938, that is more likely in September or October, but a Hurricane Belle scenario, which I remembered and which, along with 1978 on Long Island, made me a lifelong Gen X weenie.  I try to contain my weenieness in the tropical forum threads.

    NewEnglandCloseCall.png

     

  17. I'm a little weenie on New England/New York hurricanes, both of my parents remembered 1938 quite well, but a strong tropical storm with the Bermuda-Azores ridge building back in, well, not 1938, that is more likely in September or October, but a Hurricane Belle scenario, which I remembered and which, along with 1978 on Long Island, made me a lifelong Gen X weenie.  I try to contain my weenieness in the tropical forum threads.

    NewEnglandCloseCall.png

    • Like 2
  18. Insurance rates for coastal Texas residents unable to get private wind storm damage insurance going up.  At least we're not Florida, only a small portion of the state is vulnerable to tropical storms.  https://abc13.com/post/texas-windstorm-insurance-association-states-insurer-homes-businesses/15121810/

     

    EDIT TO ADD SLIGHTLY OFF TOPIC: I have relatives in DFW, they're getting enough hail storms often enough their homeowners rates are increasing

    • Sad 1
×
×
  • Create New...