Jump to content

Chicago Storm

Professional Forecaster
  • Posts

    18,614
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chicago Storm

  1. 7 hours ago, michsnowfreak said:

    What conditions caused the dust storm? I didn't hear about it til after the fact. We had nothing here.

     

    5 hours ago, SchaumburgStormer said:

    Outflow from the downstate severe storms lofted the dry dirt/dust 

    Also, add in that the area it had originated from had missed out on activity with the event on the previous day. 

    With the resurging dry/drought conditions lately, it just happened to be a perfect situation that the severe t'storm activity had collapse in that exact area.

    • Like 1
  2. Friday's dust storm was quite an experience... Never thought I'd ever report a DS at ORD.

    Peak conditions...
    ORD: DS 1/2SM G50MPH
    MDW: +DS 1/4SM G60MPH

    Info...
    •The dust storm warning for Cook County was only the second ever issued for the county. 
    •It was the first ever dust storm warning issued for downtown Chicago.
    •Per Frank Wachowski, the last dust storm of this severity in the metro area was way back on May 10th, 1934.

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 1
  3. 1 hour ago, sbnwx85 said:

    New MD out for Illinois. Monster hail possible.

    MD 794 graphic

    Mesoscale Discussion 0794
       NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
       0322 PM CDT Thu May 15 2025
    
       Areas affected...Parts of central and northern Illinois
    
       Concerning...Severe potential...Watch possible 
    
       Valid 152022Z - 152215Z
    
       Probability of Watch Issuance...60 percent
    
       SUMMARY...Large to very large hail and severe winds will be possible
       with supercells that can develop later this afternoon. Watch timing
       is uncertain but is possible later this afternoon.
    
       DISCUSSION...Cumulus are developing along an eastward moving dryline
       near the Mississippi River. Ahead of this boundary, a strongly
       unstable airmass is in place (low 90s F temperatures and mid 60s to
       low 70s F dewpoints). With the strongest mid-level ascent to the
       northwest of the region, timing of storm initiation as well as storm
       coverage are uncertain. However, given the lack of MLCIN, a isolated
       to widely scattered development appears possible later this
       afternoon. 45-55 kts of effective shear will support supercells. The
       primary hazards will be large to very large hail and severe winds.
       The tornado threat is expected to be less than farther north given
       the slightly veered low-level winds and more sizable
       temperature/dewpoint spreads at the surface.
    
       ..Wendt/Mosier.. 05/15/2025

    only watch possible?

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
  4. 4 hours ago, CheeselandSkies said:

    What doesn't look great about it to you? There are some potential failure modes to be sure but I think it checks a lot more boxes than that day did.

    *Edit Annnnnd 12Z 3K NAM coming in hot (unlike any of the CAMs at this range for 4/28). Unusual for this model to resolve semi-discrete convection like this. These simulated cells are moving through a strongly unstable and sheared environment. The solution verbatim would also resolve a lot of the timing issues that have been shown on the coarser models (especially the GFS).

    But, it really doesn't check more boxes, in a way. Capping, lack of frontal convergence (roughly south of the IL/WI border latitude), and the fact that the best dynamics are lifting further north into the Midwest/Western Great Lakes, are all significant concerns. The SPC overlooked concerns with that previous event and went with a balls to the wall approach...and failed. There is zero reason to do that once again this time across areas that are clearly more conditional.

    Highest coverage of activity will most definitely be across MN/NE IA/WI, though I think quality will be a bit more in question there. South of there, it's really too conditional overall. S Wisconsin may have the greatest shot of the most interesting activity, as there may be a more optimal overlap of everything there. South of there, sure, the environment is great across IL, but the three aforementioned issues will be problematic.

    • Thanks 1
  5. On 4/23/2025 at 5:49 AM, Baum said:

    striking how old the years of the previous winters were with so little snow.

     

    On 4/23/2025 at 5:56 AM, A-L-E-K said:

    lakefront wx site?

    Here's the list with OBS locations added.

    I should note that 9 out of 10 of RFD's least snowy seasons also occurred between 1900 and 1940. So, it was just a period filled with a lot of clunkers. RFD's least snowiest season on record was 2.8" during the 1906/07 season.

    Least Snowiest Snowfall Seasons
    1. 9.8" - 1920/21 (Downtown/Loop)
    2. 11.5" - 1921/22 (Downtown/Loop)
    3. 12.0" - 1936/37 (South-side/U of Chicago)
    4. 14.3" - 1948/49 (MDW)
    5. 17.6" - 2024/25 (ORD)
    6. 18.0" - 1898/99 (Downtown/Loop)
    7. 18.2" - 1901/02 (Downtown/Loop)
    8. 18.9" - 1924/25 (Downtown/Loop)
    9. 19.0" - 1914/15 (Downtown/Loop)
    9. 19.0" - 1912/13 (Downtown/Loop)

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...