-
Posts
18,614 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Posts posted by Chicago Storm
-
-
7 hours ago, michsnowfreak said:
What conditions caused the dust storm? I didn't hear about it til after the fact. We had nothing here.
5 hours ago, SchaumburgStormer said:Outflow from the downstate severe storms lofted the dry dirt/dust
Also, add in that the area it had originated from had missed out on activity with the event on the previous day.
With the resurging dry/drought conditions lately, it just happened to be a perfect situation that the severe t'storm activity had collapse in that exact area.
-
1
-
-
spartman broke character?
i didn't have that on my bingo card. but, i didn't have a dust storm on it either.
-
1
-
5
-
-
Friday's dust storm was quite an experience... Never thought I'd ever report a DS at ORD.
Peak conditions...
ORD: DS 1/2SM G50MPH
MDW: +DS 1/4SM G60MPHInfo...
•The dust storm warning for Cook County was only the second ever issued for the county.
•It was the first ever dust storm warning issued for downtown Chicago.
•Per Frank Wachowski, the last dust storm of this severity in the metro area was way back on May 10th, 1934.-
7
-
1
-
-
ORD had a high temp of 94° on Thursday, which broke the record high maximum temp for the date of 91° (1962).
-
1
-
-
Chicago/O'Hare had a high temperature of 94° on May 15th, which broke the record high maximum temperature for the date of 91° (1962).
-
+DS 1/4SM G60MPH at MDW.
-
Should have been issued a half hour ago.
and then they go with a tornado watch, which is comical. -
1 hour ago, sbnwx85 said:
New MD out for Illinois. Monster hail possible.
Mesoscale Discussion 0794 NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK 0322 PM CDT Thu May 15 2025 Areas affected...Parts of central and northern Illinois Concerning...Severe potential...Watch possible Valid 152022Z - 152215Z Probability of Watch Issuance...60 percent SUMMARY...Large to very large hail and severe winds will be possible with supercells that can develop later this afternoon. Watch timing is uncertain but is possible later this afternoon. DISCUSSION...Cumulus are developing along an eastward moving dryline near the Mississippi River. Ahead of this boundary, a strongly unstable airmass is in place (low 90s F temperatures and mid 60s to low 70s F dewpoints). With the strongest mid-level ascent to the northwest of the region, timing of storm initiation as well as storm coverage are uncertain. However, given the lack of MLCIN, a isolated to widely scattered development appears possible later this afternoon. 45-55 kts of effective shear will support supercells. The primary hazards will be large to very large hail and severe winds. The tornado threat is expected to be less than farther north given the slightly veered low-level winds and more sizable temperature/dewpoint spreads at the surface. ..Wendt/Mosier.. 05/15/2025
only watch possible?
-
1
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, iBrian said:
Has ORD hit a record high for the date, yet? My thermo was stuck at 93 while driving around.
Yes, it hit at least 93.
-
Most of the high res guidance has this now.
Yep. That’s a game changer right there.
Large hail/wind threat looks tops today. Tor threat is still pretty low, as spreads are too high around here. This isn’t Colorado…. 92/65 isn’t gonna cut it. But, now that I said that… -
MODS, given the increasing severe weather threat on friday across the southern portion of the subforum, can we add 5/16 to the title?
edit your original post to change the title.-
1
-
-
To add the the above, if the Euro, which is sort of alone in with the idea right now, has any clue... Things could be more interesting southward.
Check out the significant dry line/bulge it depicts pressing across N and C IL. If frontal convergence can tighten up a bit more, and if that scenario were to be more realistic and gain support, then...
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, CheeselandSkies said:
What doesn't look great about it to you? There are some potential failure modes to be sure but I think it checks a lot more boxes than that day did.
*Edit Annnnnd 12Z 3K NAM coming in hot (unlike any of the CAMs at this range for 4/28). Unusual for this model to resolve semi-discrete convection like this. These simulated cells are moving through a strongly unstable and sheared environment. The solution verbatim would also resolve a lot of the timing issues that have been shown on the coarser models (especially the GFS).But, it really doesn't check more boxes, in a way. Capping, lack of frontal convergence (roughly south of the IL/WI border latitude), and the fact that the best dynamics are lifting further north into the Midwest/Western Great Lakes, are all significant concerns. The SPC overlooked concerns with that previous event and went with a balls to the wall approach...and failed. There is zero reason to do that once again this time across areas that are clearly more conditional.
Highest coverage of activity will most definitely be across MN/NE IA/WI, though I think quality will be a bit more in question there. South of there, it's really too conditional overall. S Wisconsin may have the greatest shot of the most interesting activity, as there may be a more optimal overlap of everything there. South of there, sure, the environment is great across IL, but the three aforementioned issues will be problematic.
-
1
-
-
Initial Day 3 outlook was surprisingly underwhelming. Gun-shy after the one they put out for April 28? But this setup looks a lot more concerning simply from a trough geometry standpoint.
or it could be just because it just doesn’t look all that great and they actually realize it this time. -
Not fine according to 18z GFS.
Thursday May 22 (some spots stuck in the mid to upper 40s):
The day before Memorial Day (stuck in the low to mid 50s):
might get 49’d on the 22nd.-
1
-
-
Backdoor cold front (and daily lake cooling) gonna suck.
you new to spring in chicago?-
1
-
-
On 5/2/2025 at 11:24 AM, Chicago Storm said:
i troll spartman, and then guidance flips.
i see how it is...
canceled.
On 4/30/2025 at 12:20 PM, Chicago Storm said:another nice month on tap.
re-instated.
-
1
-
2
-
-
On 4/30/2025 at 12:20 PM, Chicago Storm said:
another nice month on tap.
i troll spartman, and then guidance flips.
i see how it is...
-
10
-
-
Another nice month? April was a washout.
Even with a garbage blocking pattern taking place this weekend into next week....
sucks 2 b u.-
2
-
-
another nice month on tap.
-
2
-
1
-
-
Topped out at 84° at ORD yesterday, which is the first official 80°+ day of the year for Chicago.
It was also just shy of a record high for the date as well.
-
1
-
-
Classic solid EML/deep summer setup tonight.
A heat burst is occurring in S IA currently, with anvil showers across N MO/S IA.
Oskaloosa, IA went from 76/64 to 81/43, with winds gusting to 69MPH.
-
1
-
-
looks like a non-event around here.
a marginal is questionable enough as it is, let alone an enhanced into portions of the CWA.-
1
-
-
On 4/23/2025 at 5:49 AM, Baum said:
striking how old the years of the previous winters were with so little snow.
On 4/23/2025 at 5:56 AM, A-L-E-K said:lakefront wx site?
Here's the list with OBS locations added.
I should note that 9 out of 10 of RFD's least snowy seasons also occurred between 1900 and 1940. So, it was just a period filled with a lot of clunkers. RFD's least snowiest season on record was 2.8" during the 1906/07 season.
Least Snowiest Snowfall Seasons
1. 9.8" - 1920/21 (Downtown/Loop)
2. 11.5" - 1921/22 (Downtown/Loop)
3. 12.0" - 1936/37 (South-side/U of Chicago)
4. 14.3" - 1948/49 (MDW)
5. 17.6" - 2024/25 (ORD)
6. 18.0" - 1898/99 (Downtown/Loop)
7. 18.2" - 1901/02 (Downtown/Loop)
8. 18.9" - 1924/25 (Downtown/Loop)
9. 19.0" - 1914/15 (Downtown/Loop)
9. 19.0" - 1912/13 (Downtown/Loop)-
2
-
2025 Short Range Severe Weather Discussion
in Lakes/Ohio Valley
Posted
LOT confirmed 1 tornado in their CWA from Tuesday's event (May 20th).
1 tornado in IL.
The 2025 LOT CWA tornado count is now 17.