Jump to content

hlcater

Members
  • Posts

    2,638
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hlcater

  1. 1 hour ago, snowlover2 said:

    Slight risk added from NE IA through NE WI on the new day 1 with marginal surrounding that. Pretty big change especially IA which for the most part wasn't even in the general storm area. Also marginal expanded northward in S IL and S OH.

    HRRR and several other CAMs seem to be alluding to a chance for a few elevated supercells/hailers this evening and overnight. We'll see how that goes.

  2. 1 hour ago, cyclone77 said:

    The couplets looked pretty nice on radar, nice and tight.  Problem is though the lowest beam height is over 5500ft out that way.  

    That storm was a wall cloud party, I was there. Issue was that there were 2 separate surface circulations and both kept spitting out wall clouds and neither became dominant over the other. What we get then is a whole bunch of wall clouds that lack the "umpf" to get it done. What was interesting is that I initially started in Mason City and bagged a brief bird fart tornado up there. Only issue with these storms was that everything was super HP, apparently there were more tornadoes, but I couldn't see them. Then as those storms went outflow dominant, came back to CR for a bit before the Tama storm initiated, then headed back out again. This storm was thankfully more classic in nature and around sunset which made it better. All in all, pretty solid chase today.

    Forest City bird fart tornado(if you look closely you can see debris above the road sign):

    4977a34c4a33a087c51df6c83e083f96.jpg

     

    Pretty nice whales mouth near Mason City:

    8fec6275b4717fe7b63f3d11d1216639.jpg

     

    and just one of the MANY wall clouds the storm near Tama/Belle Plaine produced.

     

    9d1b7839607b919ce50d66ad3c25f902.jpg

    • Like 4
  3. Looks like the next several days are going to be quite conducive to MCSs across the sub. Some people don't like MCSs, but I for one will never turn them down. (unless its at 9 AM washing out severe weather, thats always fun.) Maybe a shot at something early on in the day Saturday and especially Sunday out here. However, because it's 2018, any formidable speed shear just doesn't exist, so neither day looks like anything more than a mesoscale day.

  4. Maybe I'm thinking too much into this, but I'm extremely interested if there's a relationship between the behavior of 2010s severe wx as a whole, and the late 1980s, and you could probably even include the early 30s and late 40s as well. All of these periods where characterized by low tornado counts, and many of these years were also fighting drought conditions in at least some part of the plains/midwest. Seems to be a distinct spacial correlation between these periods, almost like a 20-30 year oscillation. But correlation isn't causation. I wish someone smart would do a research paper into this, I think there might be something there.

    • Like 2
  5. 1 hour ago, largetornado said:

    Some of the soundings for sunday along the warm front are encouraging. Mid level flow is a little weaker than ideal but 40-45 kts would get the job done. Excellent turning from 0-1 with good speed shear. It looks chasable to me. 

     

     

    I think that is contaminated. If you look at reflectivity(or MSLP) on the 12z NAM, you'll see that the NAM has a pretty significant looking MCS barreling down the warm front at 00z. All the soundings pulled ahead of this MCS(adjacent counties) are likely influenced by the convectively induced area of low pressure associated with the complex. This locally enhances wind profiles in the inflow region immediately in front of the MCS. The sounding I included is east of Champaign, and is probably more representative of the warm frontal environment on the NAM, which is still sufficient if you ask me.

    EDIT: that large area of subsidence from 850-500mb may also key into this area being an inflow region, however I am not sure on that one.

    sfcwind_mslp.us_mw.png

     

    nam_2018051812_060_40.21--87.88.png

  6. 14 hours ago, HillsdaleMIWeather said:

    Newer runs are trying to push it back til Monday

    umm no? That's a separate event. I'm talking west for IA and MO. The Sunday event and maybe monday?(idk it looks like garbage to me) are different setups on different days that just happen to involve the same boundary. The NAM/GFS have backed off a bit for Saturday, but still looks okay.

  7. The triple point looks interesting in Iowa tomorrow. SPC even has a 10% hatched there on the D2. Of course triple point concerns apply, upscale growth, storm motions into the cool sector etc. but if it looks good enough, I’ll see if I can find time to head to south central Iowa tomorrow. Regardless, convection seems to organize into 1 or 2 MCSs with time.

×
×
  • Create New...