HurricaneTracker

Same here. My parents live in Aurora and my in-laws live in Princeton, IL in central Bureau County. I am visiting them starting Tuesday. Supposed to be in Aurora early Saturday morning. I may be stuck…somewhere in N IL this week…

Delayed spring seems to be the new normal. This is the 3rd consecutive February with way above average temperatures and flowering trees/bulbs/etc. Only to be followed by a deadly freeze in March and April. And now the mountains look like they will get 4-7" of RAIN in the next 10 days or so. Incredible.

I can count on one hand the number of snowflakes I had at home today. Just a real underperforming event in the western part of the county.

Rain in Candler as well. Temps holding at 37F.

Keep waiting. I don’t see any major snow events on the horizon for at least the next 10 days.

0.62” liquid equivalent. Little to no ice in southwest Buncombe. Forecast went pretty much like I expected. NAM and RGEM were indeed too aggressive. Glad impacts to most folks are minimal!

Sitting at 32.6° with a dew point of 31° here about 10 miles southwest of Asheville. Temperatures have been rising since 6pm. All rain here.

My automated rain gauge continues to measure the precipitation. This tells me it continues to be all rain here in southwest Buncombe. 32.3°, dew point 31. No more room left for evaporative cooling. Rain gauge at 0.08” and counting. Minimal to no ZR.

34/28 here in southwest Buncombe. All rain.

Terrible mistake? Hmm. I call it forecaster intuition. To be fair, GFS still shows ice accretions along and north of AVL. I think this is far more realistic than the NAM which has ice accumulations over 0.75" across a broad swath of the central and northern foothills/mountains. Yes dewpoints are dry and yes there will be wetbulbing. But NAM and RGEM are notorious at overdoing ice accumulations. GFS is still a respectable event. Somebody is going to get a cold rain inside the warning area. To that end, even the latest HRRR is more GFS-like than the overly icy NAM. Just saying my experience in CAD ice storm events specifically is that NAM overcools the surface (but does capture warm nose aloft), while GFS is more realistic at the surface but can underdo the warm nose.

I know...I looked at it. But my feel is that the NAM is wrong. It’s far too cold. Look at initialization 2m temps this morning versus observed. It was too cold by 2-3 degrees most places. Every CAD event we have had here since November (along with RGEM) has been too cold and showing nasty ice storms when they have yet to verify. I think this event is no different. Go with the GFS if you want a solution that’s closer to reality.

It is too cold. Was off by 3-4 degrees too cold on min temps this morning. The low is also tracking 75-100 miles further north across the Midwest, giving Chicago 2-4" of snow (when their forecast was zero just last night). This means we here will see a more robust warm nose. Score one for the GFS - mostly non-event here in the mountains.

The latest HRRR is consistent with 12Z NAM. It’s a DC special. A non-event for just about everyone in North Carolina, except the highest mountains and elevated valleys. System has jumped north a good 75-100 miles. Last nights runs had no snow for Chicago...now models give them 2-4" today. This brings warm nose more robustly across NC, leaving most of us with just a brief onset of wintry precip before changing to a cold rain.

Temps wise, we’ve had a lot of wedge events this season since November. Each time the NAM and RGEM have been the cold outliers that didn’t verify. GFS has actually done well even though it’s QPF has been low all season too. So, I would take NAM QPF with GFS thermal profiles. This event turns into a Winter Wx Advisory for many in the mountains as it would be brief snow/sleet/ZR before changing to a cold rain. Gotta get further north into the deeper cold air like around DC to get good snows.

Still gotta think it is overdone. Has not yet nailed a ZR event here this season even though it has forecast many.