Jump to content

CT Valley Snowman

Members
  • Posts

    4,681
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CT Valley Snowman

  1. 58 minutes ago, moneypitmike said:

    3 posts about the 00z runs in the discussion thread.  Boy, we're a beat-down group. 

    People like sleep unless a biggie is on the doorstep

    • Like 1
  2. Just now, ineedsnow said:

    Was thinking 2 to 4 here. But could bust low if a good band develops

    That's reasonable, I would think the better banding potential is over eastern ct where I could see a spot 7-8.  Sometimes the banding pushes just a bit farther west than the models indicate but 2-4 is a reasonable call.  

  3. Just now, USCAPEWEATHERAF said:

    GFS is the same, I don't see any southeast movement everyone says they saw.

    You need to really look more carefully especially across the interior zones.  I'm thinking best chance of warning amounts are in southern and eastern ct, ri and southern and eastern ma mainly south of the pike and 84.  Probably 2-5 further west tapering down even further up into the Rt 2 corridor west of ORH county.  

  4. 1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

    well on my original map I didn't have C-1'' for the entire state...I had 1-3'' for NW and NE CT.

     1945561157_022719CTsnowmap.png.33093f05d438e92966b2748062e7d431.png

    My bad, that's certainly within the realm of outcomes.  I could see how the gradient would be more Northeast to Southwest vs highlighting the two corners of the state but I could see that how that extra orographic enhancement in the hills could produce a bit more precipitation as well.

  5. 5 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

    Nothing is redeeming 15 rainstorms for me . 

    Would be nice finish thou 

    I’d sell a K.U more than a Bob Kraft spa package 

    My treadmill mileage screen got stuck at 18.88 miles, first time that's ever happened.  1888 walking through the door would be about the only thing that could redeem this.  

    • Haha 1
  6. The grading of this winter would have a gradient similar to the gradient that has set up during these storms.  I could see how the F grade across the more Southern and Eastern portions of the region would be warranted   Being at 28" here for the season with some more enroute I'd be more inclined to go with a D grade thus far here near the Connecticut /Mass border. As lousy as it's been here we've definitely held our pack here a little bit better than areas near/south of 84 and there has been a couple of systems where Enfield has been on the colder side of the gradient but even in those systems it's still a lot of nickels and dimes overall  and a pretty cruel distribution of precipitation vs snowfall given the temperatures. 

  7. I'm at about 28", haven't been involved this year but sugarloafer has been representing Enfield well.  First time I can recall being ahead of DIT this late in the season. He'll probably pull ahead with some type of late season elevation event but who knows.  

      

  8. 35 minutes ago, Sugarloaf1989 said:

    Maybe I can get up to 30" YTD by Thursday morning. NWS has 2" forecast.

    It feels like we either nickle and dime our way to like 36",   or perhaps pull off a bigger late season event or two that could try and make a run at average snowfall.  Persistence would argue for the first scenario being the most likely but we"ll see.  

  9. 50 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

    F this winter. That's all i have to say, may it burn in hell with 01-02, 06-07 and 11-12. 

    Please send me your final snowfall totals for any locations across CT and i will post a map. Even if its a 0.4 or a Trace, any reports will be great.

    Snowfall totals across the southern 4 counties were so low that OKX didn't even do a PNS for this event, so i have nothing to go on really.

    3.75 Enfield 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...