Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    72,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. I def. see big potential during that time frame and always have, but I think the situation warrants cautious skepticism at this early juncture.
  2. Yea, if I hadn't gotten a KU there, then this would have been right on par with the all-time turds, like 1995, 2002, 2012, etc.
  3. I may be in the minority, but I would take my 19" event in Dec over a season with more seasonal snowfall and no huge events.
  4. Exactly....tougher to avail of a phase change going from +1 to +3 NAO, or vice versa.
  5. Yea, I get that, but I'd rather negative than positive.
  6. Well, I think when the month averages negative, we have a better shot of having the nuanced timing work out.
  7. 2013 had a neg NAO...tough to deal with a tough out west when the arctic and atlantic suck.
  8. 2017-2018 is actually one my favorite seasons inn a sneaky way.
  9. That was up there with 4-1-97 for me...absolutely, positively #epic.
  10. That event may be Methuen's #1....Feb 1969 was more, but longer duration.
  11. I had hoped tha the Atl would relent a bit, but knew this was a distinct possibility. Hopefully the PAC compensates a bit.
  12. We don't need it be eviscerated and replaced with March 2018...just neutralize it a bit to get a fighting chance....we'll see.
  13. Any level if skill I have is just from failing a million times...we'll see what happens. Should at least have some shots, which is more than we can say for the past two months.
  14. Anyway, the AO goes neutral soon, so I'm not sure we are so obsessed with the record positive February reading.
  15. No. March...man, you need to do your homework.
  16. The shortening of the wave legths itself is inherently sufficient to "completely disrupt things". I thought you knew that. Does it have to mean snow and cold? No.
  17. Yup....I wasn't on the boards then, but I've heard...
×
×
  • Create New...