Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    72,780
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. " Hold on....let that 1' on rt 128 settle for a day or so, I bet we'll only have to plow 10"....lol
  2. I'm doing 6 hour sweep bc that is what makes sense to me. If enlightening someone with my settled depth arouses them, I'll be more than happy to make their day by adding that, though.
  3. I haven't really interacted with her much....my twitter clique usually consists of Fisher, Judah and a bunch of other national mets.
  4. If you think about, DPW crews and private contractors, which represent the majority of clientele for snowfall forecasts, want to know how much snow is going to fall from the sky. That is what they are going to have to plow, not the settled depth 1-2 days later.
  5. Missed that, too....glad to see some reputable mets actually considered my point, as opposed to blindly dismissing.
  6. I missed that. I really like him and Juadah on Twitter. Say what you want about Judah, but he and Fisher are two of the more engaging public figures on social media that I have come across.
  7. I'm not a fan of blindly applying sweeping generalizations in meteorology...you need to assess the situation, and then consider the guidance at hand to determine what makes sense. I think hedging north with a potent SW developing in the south is wise here.
  8. I don't think we need a thread for it, but knock yourself out.
  9. I don't the performance in the tropics is particularly relevent....especially since ECMWF has stated that they have focused on the mid latitudes at the expense of the tropics with respect to recent upgrades.
  10. Right. We all joke, but at the end of the day, I also think @Damage In Tolland is very accurate and meticulous with his measurements. I don't think anyone of this core group actually inflates totals.
  11. Oh, I absolutely have a JP fetish...we all know this hahahahha
  12. I missed that part. Anyway, all I was implying is that I don't just forecast based upon what gets me more snow, which is what I thought you were trying to imply by implicating Methuen in your post.
  13. We'll see. Either way, I am not trying to imply this turns into Jan 2015...nothing that extreme.
  14. You understand that what I am implying brings the heaviest snows to your area and not mine, correct?
  15. Not necessarily in the mid level banding. You seem to be implying that I am only asserting this because it benefits my BY, which is fine. I don't forecast that way, but I guess December was a lucky guess, while most of the consensus, including you, had visions of Santa in a swim suite.
×
×
  • Create New...