coastalplainsnowman

It's 12:18 AM EST

Well you definitely have the right account name if you're going to have a thread named after you. If your name was like, for example, that guy @SleetStormNJ, this could have turned out very differently.

1 out of 2 ain't bad

Measured in a few spots and I think I'm at 6, give or take 0.5". Beautiful out. So bright, snow sticking to everything. Not sure if my memory is accurate on this, but I feel like as few and far between the storms of the 80s were, they mostly looked like this. As the kids would say, this is great "packing" snow. You could make a full fort in 5 minutes out there right now. I'm nearly at Upton's 6-23" range lol. Edit: USA Hockey gold this morning, 6" OTG, lots more to come. Give me an Old Milwaukee, because it just duddunt get any better than this.

Sorry, last post like this. From the WeatherStar3000 app I linked to earlier.

If you really want nostalgia, try out this link. Uses your location and current NWS forecast to create a spot-on 1980s TWC local update. Amazing. https://weatherstar3000.netbymatt.com/

It's ok, nothing crazy yet. Hoping before this is all over to rival the best I've ever seen here (12/30/2000.)

"People be crazy." Well there's something we can all agree on.

Speaking of which at some point would love to get you and other mets / technical folks take on what you think about on air mets increasingly showing the models and kind of deferring to them, rather than interpreting them along with all their other inputs and making a forecast. Just showing me, for example, that the GFS gives us a foot and the Euro gives us 2" doesn't really tell me anything, other than that it might snow or it might not.

I.. must...resist...injecting...politics... Ok I looked at a snow map, I'm good.

There's something poetic and sage about this reply. It's like 8 consecutive meteorological fortune cookies back to back.

NYC 28 LGA 30 ISP 31 JFK 29 EWR 32

And all this time I thought it was a reference to the teacher in the Archie comic strip, Mr. Weatherbee lol

That was the early March 2001 one where there were TWC maps with 3 ft in these parts, right? That was astounding and might as well have said 8 ft. How close to the expected start time did it become apparent that it would not be happening? Also, wasn't that another case where it was on the radar a week or six days out, then the models lost it, then it was back on the radar 4 days out but in a somewhat different form? Lastly, that was 25 years ago next week. Good God.

"overflow error"