Jump to content

aggiegeog

Members
  • Posts

    1,145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by aggiegeog

  1. 31 minutes ago, Quixotic1 said:

    Meh.  It doesn't take much.  Assuming 10:1 ratio a tenth or two of liquid precip would be nice. 

    Yep, with the whole column subfreezing it wont take much for a dusting to an inch in N TX. Hoping that the Euro begins to trend to the other models, but I think that areas E of I-35 generally near I-20 will at least get some snow between Friday afternoon and Saturday morning.

  2. Agreed

    20 minutes ago, DFWWeather said:

     

    The 12z NAM looks dry to me other than some flurries. The ECMWF is just not on board. The problem with this is there is just no moisture. The 500mb pattern is not one that favors snow and ice here. If that little system tracking in from out west could deepen and draw up enough moisture...but unlikely given pattern, especially with Gulf low developing. Those always rob DFW of moisture and we need every bit to make this happen here.

    Agreed, this looks to be an I-20 storm focused east of DFW all the way to NC. Temps will be cold enough that we should be able to make the most out of anything that does fall. The nighttime timing should also help.

  3. I am liking this set-up for NE TX. Like always its a close call, but usually we do OK with developing Gulf lows. I have a feeling DFW may be too far west for much accum though with the cold air throughout the column there may be enough for and inch or two there. North of I-20 in NE TX I could see 1-3" with maybe a 4 or 5" amount in a sweet spot (best current guess would be around Marshall for that). 

  4. 4 hours ago, vwgrrc said:

    Probably not for TX. Looks like any precipitation should be very light at this time...  

    GFS now coming back on board also. Not seeing any signs of a huge event, but there is a good shot for those north of I-20 to see 2-4". The cold is coming with storminess behind it,  that is a very good snow signal though without a STJ connection it is doubtful that we see anything heavy. 

  5. 31 minutes ago, DFWWeather said:

    12z Model suite have 500mb pattern not conducive for Texas penetration of Arctic air next week. All three, CMC, GFS, and ECMWF show stronger ridging and push the coldest air across the Great Lakes out into Atlantic. I have only looked at 12z GFS operational and it follows with eastern push of cold air.

    The operational is flip flopping between all kinds of solutions in the long range, but the ensemble still look cold. Our cold this month will not come from a big upper level trough so unless we have major ridging we will get cold as the -WPO looks to continue and western Canada stays very cold.

  6. Sure is looking like the 83 analogs that we have been hesitant to believe are proving true. I still doubt we are quite that cold but a slightly modified version sure looks possible. 

    As for current weather the wintery precip potential looks as good as ever according to current models. We won't know how much precip will lag behind in the cold air until it is happening though. We are now getting into the range of the Hi-Res models so we should get a better handle on it as we go through the day.

  7. 8 minutes ago, bubba hotep said:

    We've gotten lucky in DFW in the past with these sneaky little disturbances that end up overperforming. You've been pretty steadfast that this was a possible solution. Now to track that little vort max to see if will tip its hand early.

    These are always tricky, but I have had a feeling that this was not going to be a classic blue norther for a while now though, maybe this will be one of my lucky ones. The trend is good.

  8. 1 minute ago, bubba hotep said:

    From FWD AFD:

    
    For late Wednesday into Thursday---Broad troughing should be
    enough to assist any weak frontogenetical forcing to produce some
    very light precipitation late Wednesday into Thursday. Both GFS
    and ECMWF models output a fair amount of QPF just south of the
    I-20 corridor and down through Central TX. While there is good
    agreement in both of these models, the overall forcing appears
    pretty subtle and as a result, I`ll trend on the lower side for my
    PoP/QPF. If forcing becomes stronger/more apparent---it`s
    possible that PoP/QPF will need to be adjusted in magnitude and
    space. P-type forecast is difficult due to the uncertainty
    revolving around the amount of lift juxtaposed with the best
    moisture and cold air. As mentioned above, most NWP appears to be
    too warm with regards to their hourly temperature output. In
    addition, it`s likely that if precipitation is falling, more cooling
    of the lower troposphere will likely continue. After closely
    examining model soundings and discussion with surrounding offices,
    I`ve added some wintry precipitation, mainly along and southwest
    of an area bounded by an Eastland to Waxahachie to Waco to
    Temple/Killeen line. Initial precipitation in the wake of the
    front will start out as light rain/drizzle before transitioning to
    light freezing/rain/drizzle. As the depth of the colder air
    increases and secondary ice processes (seeder-feeder) begin to
    dominate, a transition to light snow will be possible for the
    aformentioned areas.

    I was about to post that NWS offices are picking up on the wintery precip chances. Looks like the best chances are along I-20 generally with highest chance out west, but some chance in southern N TX and maybe a bit into E TX.

×
×
  • Create New...