Jump to content

mimillman

Members
  • Posts

    3,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mimillman

  1. Everyone’s favorite model the SREF is pretty consistent at 9z. Looks like ORD plumes have all but 1 member above 4”, a cluster between 4-6”, and a cluster of 8-10”. The mean is skewed high as a result, but think the lower cluster could pan out, albeit highly ratio-dependant.

    Some other stations I’m rooting for:

    Benton Harbor, MI: mean of 28.5”

    GRR: mean of 20.5”

    South Bend: mean of 18.7”

    Toledo: mean of 3.8”

    Lansing, aka the snow desert of the Midwest: 9.1”

    Indy: 4.7”

    The plumes in SW MI are some of the most impressive SREF outputs I’ve seen for this area with a cluster at 17-25” and a cluster at 25-35”.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Weenie 1
  2. 14 minutes ago, Stevo6899 said:

    I've been fighting Josh for years. I don't know why I bother anymore. I guess i thought i could wear him down but hes been consistently glass half full. He looks at the big picture, while I prefer the big dog and fine with no snow outside of that. Different strokes I suppose. I'll take C- from a dry/ornery negative Nancy like yourself. If you were a professor, you'd prob flunk a whole class cause you could. 

    This is funny 

  3. 2 minutes ago, Roger Smith said:

    00z NAM looks to be an upgrade especially for s MI. The low stays on the Michigan side of L Huron through the deepening process. I don't know if it does any good for Chicago, but it may mean that some forecast amounts for MI are low. I think this evolution is going to create sustained S+ bands across much of lower MI and amounts of 20-25 inches could occur in a few places. Will go for 22.5" at GRR, 15.0" LAN, 6.0" DTW, 12.5" MBS and 17.5" APN, possibly 18-25" TVC and MKG over the full duration of the storm. 

    Gonna need another hand for those rare 12” events in Lansing

    • Haha 1
    • Weenie 1
  4. 2 minutes ago, Stevo6899 said:

    We're not talking about the start to this winter. Josh can turd polish our snow avg vs other cities all he wants, but we miss out on the big dogs. We discuss this every winter, and nothing changes. It's just the way it is. Life goes on...

    Just in case you missed this…


    ok I’m done now. Sooooo, how about that SREF 

    DB8632A9-DEE3-4127-B80A-CF5F73615165.jpeg

    • Like 1
  5. 10 minutes ago, LansingWeather said:

    How is that wrong? I have lived in this area for the majority of my life. The best storms go west and east of Michigan, it warms up and we lose the few inches we manage to get. Lansing is too far from the lake to get anything other than mood flakes, good storms that make it nearly every time have mixing issues as well.

    So, here’s a map of average snowfall in the Midwest. I’m sure Des Moines, Indy, St Louis, Chicago, or a number of other major Midwest metropolitan areas would trade you when it comes to snow in particular :rolleyes:

     

    B054432E-069E-4DD8-869D-51660B4E389E.jpeg

    • Like 1
  6. 3 minutes ago, weathafella said:

    I’ve never seen so much srefs talk!  I don’t think I’ve considered them as legitimate guidance for >5 years.  My understanding is what you see on the 15z srefs is based on the 12z NAM init which is why there can be a large disconnect between the 15z srefs and the 18z NAM.  Is my understanding correct?

    It’s the only legitimate model when times are rough 

    • Like 3
    • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...