stormtracker
-
Posts
64,383 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by stormtracker
-
Didn't even bother to look at 18z. I'll take your word for it
-
Ok nevermind. Next up GFS!
-
Lack of ICON discussion should tell you something. Next up...RGEM!
-
My bad. It's def not coming now
-
Went ahead and pinned this...I guess 12 hours sooner won't hurt
-
Well, I was gonna give it another day, but if yall want the thread, I'll leave it. Movin on over there
-
NAM is def better at H5 vs 18z, Im at 81...some snow, just above freezing at this frame tho. 84: Precip heavier, still slightly above freezing, still all around kinda sloppy tho
-
It is. Sort of like the GFS did vs it's 12z run. Stop being positive, it's unsettling.
-
Notable takeaway for the winter maybe.
-
It's a dud. Nothing save from some light stuff
-
Imma give it one more day and then pretty much settle into that realization and hope for the best
-
We can't even get an advisory level event right and you focusing on a HECS on the 300+ GFS
-
Doesn't work out for us
-
I think the closed low was actually better positioned (further west and neutral/ slight neg tilt) vs 12z
-
It's not good
-
Go figure. Surface looks worse tho 12z Surface was better. This run, H5 is better. I dunno
-
Actually kinda looks better than 12z at H5 so far. S.w digs to same latitude, but slightly further west
-
What we need to dig ain't digging enough so far. Seems just short of 12z attm
-
Maybe I phrased that wrong. I meant the initial piece on the west side. That swirlie thing
-
Seeing heights/ridging whatever out front a bit higher vs 12z
-
Seems better than the NAM, but I don't think it'll do what we need ultimately
-
Probably more like 72 hours and I don't care if anybody comes with that superstition shit. Around that time we could be talking about 2 separate events.
-
This is basically what I was saying earlier. I don't like these scenarios as shown. I'm just going forward thinking things will change
-
-
