Jump to content

stormtracker

Administrators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    61,476

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by stormtracker

  1. stormtracker
    No appreciable changes through 24
  2. stormtracker
    Damn autocorrect! Thanks. Seems like project is delayed until 11..so may have one last pbp left
  3. stormtracker
    ok. Going offline for a bit. Actually have work to do at work. Y’all can get pbp from DDweather, because evidently he doesn’t think i know how to read a f*cking h5 chart.
  4. stormtracker
    Ok? I was comparing 3 models. The 12z was closer to 0z than 6z. Pretty clearly
  5. stormtracker
    It wasn't. Edit. I'm not sure what you are trying to say?
  6. stormtracker
    Again, basically goldilocks run. Between 0z and 6z. Something to feel better about, but nothing to go super nuts over. And thats the movie folks. General 2 to 4 across the area by 81hr. Looks like we're done after that.
  7. stormtracker
    Argument can be made that the trough is very close to 0z now
  8. stormtracker
    Closer to the coast...and again and again...better than 6z
  9. stormtracker
    Argument could be made that if you look at 0z (I know, I said I wasn't anymore) and this run, the trof is sharper at 0z, but with 12z, the trof is neutral whereas with 0z at this point, it was still positively tilted. Seems like a wash, because heights are slight lower with this run
  10. stormtracker
    54, same as above
  11. stormtracker
    Nrn stream diving in souther, TPV aligned better. Trof still positively titled just west of the MS river
  12. stormtracker
    Still positive improvements over 6z. At this point, I'll stop with the 0z, no longer useful since it's clear that will be better than this run. Basically, relative to all 3 runs, this one can be some up as the goldilocks run. Right in the middle
  13. stormtracker
    Northern stream better aligned, better height rises so far than 6z
  14. stormtracker
    out to 45. It's obvious it will be better than 6z for sure.
  15. stormtracker
    I'll be comparing to 0z, 6z btw
  16. stormtracker
    So far, NAM looks better than 6z, not as good as 0z
  17. stormtracker
    Well guys, this is it for me. 12z. IF things go down hill, I think Imma walk away for a bit. Not gonna stay here and whine and mope and shit up the thread for everyone else. So, here I am
  18. stormtracker
    Go to bed. Not the run we were looking for vs 18z. But not a disaster
  19. stormtracker
    It's a broader trof and thus sfc is easter
  20. stormtracker
    Eastern side of the trof when it gets closer to us is flatter...not as sharp as 18z
  21. stormtracker
    Flatter in front at 69
  22. stormtracker
    TPV (or whatever the big gyre thing is over NE Canada) kinda pressing a bit more, lowering heights from 18z from the northern vort
  23. stormtracker
    So far , pretty similar except for slightly lower heights in front, but again...not fatal
  24. stormtracker
    Looks like tail/western vort is a hair west of where it was at 18z
  25. stormtracker
    Nothing remarkable at 33
×
×
  • Create New...