Jump to content

stormtracker

Administrators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    61,590

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by stormtracker

  1. stormtracker
    Still going at 90...freezing line sagging to RIC
  2. stormtracker
    GFS is giving us more of whatever it is frozen than 18z
  3. stormtracker
    moderate frozen going on at 84. freezing line in St mary's county. 0 850 line in Frederick
  4. stormtracker
    Further south so far, moderate precip...Freezing line on DC south line. Before, with 18z run, it was north of DC into upper mont. county
  5. stormtracker
    Or moderate events? Or just any event, but it has to be snow?
  6. stormtracker
    Do I play Jaws only for snow?
  7. stormtracker
    lol, again...the front is a little more SE than it was at 18z 78
  8. stormtracker
    GFS staring danger in the face with a middle finger so far. Not backing down
  9. stormtracker
    ok, 66 .if anything the freezing line is a hair south of where it was at 18z
  10. stormtracker
    Seems like noise so far, but 0z axis is tilted just a lil more than 18z. otherwise, they remain identical
  11. stormtracker
    GFS doesn't seem to be backing down...almost twin copy of 18z so far at sfc
  12. stormtracker
    GFS very similar to 18z so far, hr 40
  13. stormtracker
    Not even close to the 18z GFS. This model is stupid. (until it shows what we want)
  14. stormtracker
    Yeah, as the main slug of moisture before the wave starts moving up, the front is just stuck in WV and even moves NW just a tiny bit
  15. stormtracker
    Kinda...just not enough. But I am higher than the heights in front
  16. stormtracker
    the move south is there, but much more so over KY, OH. Where we need it to get souther is just held up..
  17. stormtracker
    Ok, the sag south is noticeable..but it's like a bulge on the SE end
  18. stormtracker
    Hopefully I'm wrong and you and Winterwx can put me in a box
  19. stormtracker
    I actually hope I'm wrong, so don't jump down my throat. Anyway, sfc freezing like made a move S and E toward the area vs 18z...I'm at 69...heh
  20. stormtracker
    heights in the most important part are not lower...compare the h5 maps between 18z and 0z. Ill die on that hill. Maybe a met can solve. 60 vs 66. If I'm wrong, I'll admit it, no problem.
  21. stormtracker
    Theres some light precip at 54 with what looks like CAD, with shallow cold but won't hold.
  22. stormtracker
    I am. Let's see what happens. Lower heights should allow the cold to press in a little quicker
  23. stormtracker
    Can't totally agree with that. I know where you're looking..I'm looking at our latitude and north. We'll see
  24. stormtracker
    Hey, so far I'm right. Waiting tho. Butterfly effect bro
  25. stormtracker
    Looking at the H5 on the NAM, can't say I'm encouraged. Heights slightly higher at 30
×
×
  • Create New...