Jump to content

stormtracker

Administrators
  • Posts

    61,788
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stormtracker

  1. Damn. They arent even close. Maybe the GFS is actually out to lunch as others have suggested
  2. Maybe the models don't have a handle on the block and the complicated pattern. -Weenie theorem 1.12
  3. H5 low centered around the IA/SD border. 0z it was down centered over central MO
  4. SFC low is northwest of the 0z position. Was in NE Mo, now it's NW IA
  5. sw in the pacific nw is gone and our s/w is a bit further norther. Surface low is in NE Nebraska
  6. Confluence, blocking is a tiny bit less, but with 0z it also looked "bad" at this timeframe before that bitch got the heavy shove south of us...I'd advise waiting to draw any conclusions at this point.
  7. Euro is different near WA state coast. 0z had the egg horizontal. Now its southern and vertical within the trof
  8. So far Euro is close to its 0z run...base of trof is a teeny tiny bit further south
  9. Differences between 6z and 12z can be readily seen now. 6z has a broader trof/sw, but again 12z less ridging better confluence out in front
  10. Positive changes in the east...confluence is better..but low still cuts up into IA now
  11. The positive here is that the ridging out front is noticeable flatter over the east, but again..seems to be countered by a stronger trof out west
  12. Well, at least Nebraska and the Dakotas are getting a nice snow storm
  13. Cosgrove is pretty bad tbh At any rate, the height rises over the east are noticeable lower, but looks like it won't make a difference
  14. Height rises now are a bit higher than 6z. This run won't be the Euro for sure. Differences out west are vast vs Euro ETA, heights in the south are slightly lower now, but nothing earthshattering
  15. It's amplified, but not as much as 6z. Not major, but you can tell for sure
×
×
  • Create New...