Jump to content

Heisy

Members
  • Posts

    8,369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Heisy

  1. 11 minutes ago, Moderately Unstable said:

    It is an in house model. It's WSI's (the weather channel's parents') internal convection allowing high resolution model. They're also, fun fact, the one's developing deep thunder (aka graf)--which once operational will use a 15km grid, BUT, will have a 1 way 3 km upscaling in the conus--which they are suggesting will let them do away with convective parameterization (so that they can actually model individual thunderstorm cells). One way because those 3km cells won't then feed back out to the larger domain.  Basically the small cells get initialized by the boundary conditions of the larger domain (15km), then, operate independently. Now, if they're successful--this would be fantastic for mesoscale forecasting because it could (theoretically) enable one to almost predict in advance which cells would have sustained rotation with high accuracy and locational precision (SPC and NSSL toolsets allow for meso tracking already but it's more of a general "idea" than precise here at this time type of data...even though the output simulated radar sorta acts as though that isn't the case). But color me skeptical. They're working with IBM on this--I believe with a machine learning type of approach...in any case from what I've seen of the large domain GRAF so far, looks promising. Neither is available to the public (frankly it isn't even available to everyone in the private sector), and they're EXTREMELY protective of access to it, which is why I don't post the maps here. You can get in some actual trouble doing that. Like any model, it's guidance. But for whatever reason, it really is "worth" WSI's protectiveness...it's good. I've used it to chase individual thunderstorms before by using it to time out to a half hour interval where a particular cell would be and where. For mesoscale enhanced setups like this one, it tends to do a good job. 

     

    WRT the || Euro, keeping up to speed on the rapid-fire-changes of the operational and ensemble guidance while checking model verification and current obs, and doing my day job...haven't had time to look at that today haha. Link?

     

    Thanks for the info!

     WRT parallel euro, Someone linked it in the mid Atlantic forum earlier today, it had weatherbell graphics but I couldn’t locate it on the site... anyway...

    Any idea why the Para GFS, 00z Ukie, and some others have a “snow hole” over Philly? Is it because we miss out on the waa fronto thump and the coastal snows just NW? Maybe the h7 low tracking too far inland? 

  2. 10 minutes ago, Moderately Unstable said:

    I love a good finale, don't you? 00z RPM keeps the trend of the 18z and 21z runs....corridor mostly snow, gives 12-16 widespread totals. Places like BAL & IAD are modeled at between 20-24" (outside of our domain but notable). Gotta keep watching this though. There's a sweet spot here for the track of the sfc and 850 low centers. The models have hit that place now. My internal sense here is, the whole 12+" thing...we've been down this road many times. Models a couple days out provide clown like totals. I think we're reaching consensus now that impacts are going to be enough here--in the form of snow--to most likely at some point down the road req a WSW for the corridor and areas NW. Exactly what the totals are...probably too soon to say, but I sure do love the 00z runs coming in now. If I were a TV met this is when I'd start talking more substantively about the "potential". 

    Is RPM an in house model? Is it available to public? Also what is the deal with the new parallel euro? It was a pretty big hit earlier today.

  3. For the city it is going to come down to where that initial fronto banding sets up. This storm won’t be able to give us snow from the coastal since the upper levels are t great. Think of PD2 where that initial fronto crushed DC and that area. I’d rather be north right now of where GFS has it so no complaints yet. That is a way we could get “screwed” though where initial waa banding is south thru Md line. Then mid levels toast for the coastal part. Places to the NW of city may be able to hold Onto snow longer from The coastal. It’s why you see the snow hole over us on the 18z para gfs

    • Like 1
    • Weenie 1
  4. 14 hours ago, snowwors2 said:

     

    Too much volatility...

    Another wait and see (but much waffling in between)!

    Last night on 11pm NBC10, Steve Sasna said we had caught a break for Monday Tuesday because the models had warmed...NOW look where we are less than 24 hours later (and it may/will change again by tomorrow evening)!

    This widespread deep snowpack has A LOT of staying power that no models will forecast accurately...Seen it many times over many years!!

    Are you mixing up the events? Tonight is a no go. This event is Thursday that has the chance for legit snowfall. 
     

    Was thinking about starting my first thread for the event since were under 4 days, but idk haha

    • Like 1
  5. 12 minutes ago, LP08 said:

    I suppose the one thing that's consistent so far on guidance is the surface is frigid.  Don't need rates to overcome 33-35 at the surface.  I would take a 6hr dynamic system of all types of precip at 28-30 degrees.  1-5" of snow/sleet would be fun.

    Yep, comes in at a good time too. Early morning. Wake up drink some coffee and watch the radar light up with some fronto banding. Nothing better. Let’s gooo

×
×
  • Create New...