Jump to content

87storms

Members
  • Posts

    6,634
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 87storms

  1. looking at satellite it's gonna be difficult to avoid the rains this afternoon.  i don't think the short range guidance do a real good job of smoothing out the precip.  maybe they're too focused on convection.

  2. the downpour last night was wild.  woke me up at 2am and it lasted at least 30 minutes.  just kept teeming.  legitimate stuff, but went largely unnoticed due to the timing.  some of the nearby rain gauges are showing 1.5-2" of rain today and that seems believable based off of what i saw.

  3. 2 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

    Per the obs thread - slight risk already in place for Friday from roughly DC and then to the north and east. 

    Day 3 risks are fraught with potential to bust :lol:

    i'm not finding this to be a particularly impressive severe season at all.  i guess we've had a few storms, but not imby.  last year seemed better overall.

  4. we're clearly in the boring storms period of weather.  not a fan of relying on leftover debris from systems coming from nw.  that's very clipper-like and we are absolutely horrendous at clippers.  might need something more organized from the ohio valley or a frontal passage...or a mcs is always acceptable.

  5. 5 hours ago, osfan24 said:

    I'm sure it was somewhat of a factor or exacerbated the situation, but the bottom line is they had a very intense, long-duration event and the topography of the area literally checks all boxes in terms of what you would look for when it comes to a town and flash flooding. It is basically built in a valley surrounded on all sides by steep hills, is a narrow street lined with buildings, sits next to a major river and is also built on top of a river. It's essentially sitting in the bottom of a bucket or bowl. Fill up cups of water and dump them into a bowl from all sides and watch what happens.

    The other evidence that this is almost entirely topography driven is that nearby Catonsville received even more rain than Ellicott City. While there was some flooding, it was not the catastrophic damage we saw on Main Street. Catonsville is more developed than Ellicott City, but it doesn't have buildings that sit near the Patapsco, nor is it built on top of a river.

    flooding and white water rapids flowing down a main street are pretty different.  i'm not gonna say i'm right...not enough knowledge in this area...but i gotta lean towards development off the bat as being a significant issue here.

  6. 17 hours ago, AfewUniversesBelowNormal said:

    No, we haven't. This is like 175% water after ice cubes melt, in the air and stuff. It's not thunderstorm producing. 

    we may not have gotten much severe, though we rarely do well with that because we're the king of breeze, not gusts - which are usually more localized here unless we're getting a derecho (and that occurs about as often as a blizzard).  this is a palm beach airmass.  i expect gully washers and some lightning.  any wind is a bonus, if you like you wind.

  7. we can do well with storms in these stagnant type air masses.  here's hoping for some good bangers this afternoon and/or tomorrow.  the lwx disco mentioned lightning as a risk:

     

    The severe (large hail/damaging wind) threat this afternoon
    should be relatively limited given marginal lapse rates and
    shear, but a few strong wind gusts are possible with more
    robust/water- loaded updrafts. Frequent lightning may be a
    hazard given large areas of updrafts in the 0 to -15 C region,
    suggesting lots of suspended small ice particles (graupel) which
    would be favorable for excess charge separation. This could
    prove especially hazardous given the holiday weekend and lots of
    ongoing outdoor activities, so even though storms may
    technically not be severe, they could prove just as dangerous.
×
×
  • Create New...