Jump to content

87storms

Members
  • Posts

    6,674
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 87storms

  1. 40 minutes ago, high risk said:

        What'a going on, I think (based off the NAM3), is that you have a huge slug of precip occurring during the evening hours - looks like well over an inch between 00z and 06z when the "snow" really piles up.    The soundings are really, really iffy in terms of sleet potential, but the model microphysics are allowing for some pingers to be mixed in with the rain.     Let's say that we have 1.3" of liquid falling and the model thinks that it's 60% rain and 40% sleet pellets:   we know that would not accumulate, but the tallying does 1.3" x 0.6 = 0.52" liquid of "snow (+ sleet) accumulation".   TT slaps a 10:1 ratio on that and gets 5.2" of "snow", while the Ferrier method will assign a way lower SLR since it knows that the frozen component is sleet and not snow.   

    I thought it would calculate the 40% instead. Either way, I can see why the snow maps would be off. This event might be too marginal to toss yet, at least for the northern tier.

    edit: nevermind, I think you meant (1.3”)x(0.4). Makes sense 

  2. 13 minutes ago, DCTeacherman said:

    The GFS  has us changing over to snow at 13z-14z Sunday per the precip-type maps on stormvista.   Precip departs between 18z-19z so it supports a period of back end snow, although rather light (<.1 QPF).  Could be some nice snowtv though as the arctic front comes through. 

    that's what i'm thinking.  if we can change back over a few hours earlier than the gfs is showing, there might be enough precip to work with to make things interesting.

  3. if the cad stays intact longer and is better than advertised, then the backside of this system could work out.  there's still plenty of precip around when temps start to crash.  it might just be a matter of how far they need to crash to changeover to snow.  i'd be pretty interested in this if i was the northern tier since there's a better chance of the cad holding on longer.  dc/bmore need some work.

  4. shouldn't take too long for flakes to fly given the dews and we currently have an easterly wind.  nam 3k has some better lift moving through right before rush hour, so that could be our start time.

    edit: probably close to the end of rush hour, but sometimes these systems move in a little quicker than advertised.  kind of a weak sauce event, but maybe we can get enough steady/moderate to coat things.

  5. cmc hints at what's going wrong with this weekend system as it's showing phasing way north with that ns energy.  not sure if that's how it'll work out, but we need this system to stay separated and/or have it lagging behind that reinforced blocking.  i may have some of these details confuzzled, but i think we want a slower overall ss or a trailing wave to start appearing so that we actually have precip to work with when temps crash.

  6. 7 minutes ago, WEATHER53 said:

    This will not cut

    i don't know that i buy the cutters, but i think app runner is an issue (though i suppose that classifies as a cutter).  it also doesn't look there's going to be ideal cad developing out ahead of it because of that southeast ridge.  it's a setup worth monitoring, but i could see how it could still be an apps runner even with the favored banana highs over top.

  7. 4 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

    Unfortunately there's no mechanism to lock hp over the top. The war let's hp easily slide east as the storm approaches and the hp behind is in a bad position too. Imho- a west track is practically a lock at this point. 

    yea i think we'd need this to transfer to the carolina coast or something to make it work.  as is, it's an app runner, though i wouldn't really expect that based off of the high pressure to the north.  they look at least somewhat favorable.

  8. this last storm is proof that things can change pretty quickly.  one thing that's pretty clear for this area (at least from my view) is that we have a better chance at precip overperforming than cold.  this last storm looked squashy, but we found a way because we've got the gulf and atlantic on our side.  "snow" cold is just not as easy.  for the weekend situation, that high placement looks good in the midwest, but we may need it to be further east.  this last storm we had a stout high tracking over top in unison with the southern stream.

×
×
  • Create New...