Jump to content

Nelson

Members
  • Posts

    541
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nelson

  1. Somewhat of an odd storm evolution - if you simply looked at the SLP track, it looks like a classic mid-west snowstorm but surface features don't really play out that way (looks more like a glorified frontal passage). Much like the last storm, models have been fairly consistent with roughly .5 qpf for mby. I think 3-5" looks like a good call.

  2. Models have been pretty consistent with averaging around .5 qpf in SW Dane County. I'm going with a 5-6" call imby. Remarkable overall consistency for days now (outside of the usual wobbles) as opposed to the last system where we were still seeing some decent shifts leading into the event - so I don't know if we'll get that last minute shift north this time. I think the heaviest totals look to stay just south of the WI/IL border. Good luck everyone.

     

    • Like 4
  3. 1 minute ago, McHenrySnow said:

    Am I writing in a foreign language? Or do you guys not bother to read.  Where did I say I’m choosing one model over the other. I’ve repeatedly said my expectations have increased and I’m not worried about getting completely shafted like I once was. 

    At the end of the day, if you have a met tag there are high expectations for the content you post. Most of us expect to see folks with met tags posting analysis and helping the rest of us understand better. I've seen neither from you. Mostly what I see is complaining. So if you're going to carry that met tag, and continue to complain and otherwise not provide any meaningful analysis, you should expect to get trolled. It really is as simple as that.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 5
  4. MKX

    LONG TERM...
    
    Thursday Night through Saturday...Forecast Confidence is Medium.
    
    Models have started to trend toward a stronger deepening low that
    lifts NE Friday into Saturday. Previous guidance was flatter with
    the progression and kept some of the precip bottled up further
    south. This change would favor more precip wrapping into
    southeastern Wisconsin as the low pushes east. Now with that
    said, there are still some questions as to whether models have a
    good handle on the system. The initial low digs into MO/AR
    Thursday night into Friday and transitions into a closed low over
    the TN/OH Valleys. Then a second piece of energy digs south and
    this is what could cause the system to deepen as the two features
    phase over the OH Valley. The past few systems that have impacted
    the area have had a similar trend where 2-4 days (where we are
    currently) out models had more significant phasing and stronger
    lows which bumped up QPF totals. Then as you got closer in the 1-2
    day period they backed off and QPF amounts trended back down.
    This has largely been the result of models inability to handle the
    phasing of closed lows. Will be keeping a close on eye on how
    guidance handles these features over the next few model cycles.
    Subtle adjustments to QPF were made with this forecast and these
    changes keep us below the 50th percentile for both QPF and Snow
    amounts. This is likely a good place to be based on the lingering
    uncertainty. Both GFS and ECMWF ensemble guidance are narrowing in
    on some of those higher QPF and snow amounts. So, if models hold
    onto this trend will likely continue to nudge amounts upwards.
    
    Another complicating factor is that with the low deepening warmer
    air gets wrapped in and temps Friday through Saturday could be
    such that we end up with more of a mix of rain/snow than all snow.
    The profile aloft is cold enough for all snow but there could be a
    deep enough layer near the surface to melt some of the snow. Do
    think models could have a slight warm bias to temps and have
    nudged values down slightly but this would still support a
    rain/snow mix.
    
    The system exits to the east Friday night into Saturday with light
    snow ending by Saturday afternoon. Temperatures through the period
    hold pretty steady around freezing for lows and into the mid 30s
    for highs.
  5. Northern extent of the 850 temps have trended south, over the past 24 hours, on the GFS. NAM 850s have started trending north. Feels like the WI/IL border will be a good compromise for northern extent of the 850s. 950 temps are slightly warmer. What that means for precip types, who knows.

     

    gfs_T850_us_fh54_trend.thumb.gif.ea213a0fb7943c929e85b58b02ee4d86.gif

    nam_T850_us_fh42_trend.thumb.gif.685349b6fe0e78cf41b2e7eb1b7362d8.gif

    • Thanks 2
  6. 30 minutes ago, ChiTownStorm11 said:

    It's undeniable that the GFS won this storm. It has been showing the southern solution for days.

    It sure seems like the early GFS ideas of a more SE/weaker track is going to win out. It would appear that my "Euro is king" call, along with the NW trend, was premature. Overall, models were pretty disappointing for this storm.

    Feel bad for the NWS offices that will take the brunt of the criticism from the less meteorologically educated public.

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...