Jump to content

andyhb

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    20,320
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by andyhb

  1. image.thumb.png.df0b989c86292388e74f702489f4436f.png

    18z EPS mean is 10" for the QC even at 10:1 ratios, pretty impressive considering I'd expect the ratios to be better than that through a good chunk of the storm. This will punch above its weight class SLP depth wise given the favorable dynamics aloft and very strong LLJ/WAA minus a lot of strong convection in the warm sector. Height falls look excellent on the 00z GFS.

    image.thumb.png.edb0a637b33502dacc20cf7bcc3bd7d1.png

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 1
    • clap 1
  2. 6 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said:

    This is a very good and valid point.

    IIRC that wave had a deepening trend closer to verification as well as the PV lobe became better resolved, I remember having some back and forth with @RCNYILWX about it at the time.

    The issue this time is that the upstream ridge isn't quite as amplified as that, and there's a bit more phasing required here for a higher end outcome.

    • Like 2
  3. Jamaica is in serious trouble with this one if it is able to drift westward and develop as conditions become more favorable shear-wise. An approach from the south ala the 12z Euro would be a) highly unusual and b) the most dangerous for Kingston especially if it winds up in the RFQ by some stroke of bad luck. Most of the really nasty TCs in Jamaica's history (e.g. Gilbert, Charlie) have approached from the E/ESE.

    • Like 1
    • 100% 3
  4. Could always tell (and appreciate) when it was Burns who was moderating since he treated it all as it should be treated -> as a principal disciplining unruly children.

    RIP to a good man.

    • Like 12
  5. On 6/27/2025 at 10:10 AM, TradeWinds said:

    The new, state of the art WSF-M just achieved IOC in April. While the Space Force paid for it, NOAA is in talks with them. There are also other microwave imagery data still available to civilian agencies. Also, for the record, the decision to spilt the civilian and defense weather satellite programs was made in 2012 under the Obama Administration.

    Why are we trying to spin this as a good thing? Seriously.

    There is no good reason to end SSMIS regardless of what program it is a part of. The other microwave imagery is significantly degraded compared to SSMIS.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 3
    • Disagree 1
  6. 25 minutes ago, FPizz said:

    How has it improved predicted track accuracy?  I've seen zero improvement in that department.  That's what matters most out of anything.  Strength of storms they've been pretty accurate with for a few decades now even without microwave imagery.  

    So monitoring/predicting rapid intensification is worth nothing? Yeah, no. Intensity forecasting is the more difficult aspect of TC forecasting compared to track.

    • Thanks 2
    • 100% 2
×
×
  • Create New...