Jump to content

Radtechwxman

Members
  • Posts

    2,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Radtechwxman

  1. Just now, janetjanet998 said:

    It has been been there for two days in some of the models....I have have seen it happen many times so I wouldn't LOL too much

    I foresee  a moderate band of mod-heavy snow with a sharp south cut off drifting north starting at I-80 then stalling north of  I-88..meanwhile precip will blossom south of us...and it will struggle to fill the gap this far north..and when it does it will be moving fast or almost over with

     

     

     

     

     

     

    7 minutes ago, DLMKA said:

    I'm 20 miles west of PIA in the EURO screwhole with you

    I agree that there will likely be a screw hole somewhere with subsidence in between intense bands but one as large as Euro no way. I think FV3 had a more realistic portrayal of it

    • Like 1
  2. 1 minute ago, Chicago Storm said:


    Remember how badly it did with last weekends storm...Most runs didn’t have above 9” anywhere. We know how that worked out...


    .

    Literally was just thinking that. It under estimated northern fringe of accumulating snow and only had like 5-7in here when 10-13in fell

  3. 2 minutes ago, cyclone77 said:

    The fact that the Euro continues the weak sauce output definitely makes me lean towards it and the wussy GFS as well.  Unfortunately it looks like the NAM/RGEM are incorrect.  

    Sadly I think you're right. Pretty close to throwing in the towel on this one coming together but going to hold off to see if sampling will change model output or not. Would like to see support from the globals in favor of the hi-res

  4. Just now, cyclone77 said:

    I'm kind of puzzled as to which side to choose.  Usually I'd lean towards the hi-res around this time, but the globals seem to be holding their ground.  If the Euro comes in similar to it's previous few runs I really won't know what to think lol. 

    The thing is the globals seem to be drastically different with erratic changes so not sure. Sampling can't come soon enough. Lol

  5. 9 minutes ago, hlcater said:

    00z globals seems pretty ho-hum with regards to run to run change this evening. Because of that, I'm more inclined to side with them over the NAM. They didn't downtrend or really trend anywhere at all, just kinda held serve with 18/12z.

    Yea kind of left puzzled. But not surprising because we still haven't had a sample yet. Hopefully that will help hone in models tomorrow. We're getting closer to NAM's good range. Am curious to see if Euro budges

  6. Just now, Stebo said:

    In my scenario if we want the deformation band to hold into the region longer, we need this to go negative tilted.

    Totally agree. You may have a shot being further east but I may be too west to benefit from it. Depends on if and when that even occurs. 18z runs were certainly more encouraging 

  7. 6 minutes ago, ryanmkay said:

    Honestly looking forward to next weeks storm also. Grand Rapids WFO said it is the more significant snow.

    Models can barely handle this storm that's a few days away so I wouldn't get excited about anything next week yet. Lol. It will be an active pattern but how significant remains to be seen

    • Like 1
  8. 3 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

    Nobody should be swinging like that based on model runs for a storm 3+ days out.  

    Never said I was "swinging" but you can tell the overall mood and lack of posts reflects disappointment. I mean yea it is days away and anything is still on the table. I am curious to see how euro looks tonight

  9. Just now, andyhb said:

    Relying on a phase is always a dangerous game to play if you're looking for the high end.

    Couldn't agree more. I'm not as hopeful as I once was for this. Has high end potential but seems to be a lot of misses on models. At least there looks to be a cold, active pattern ahead

×
×
  • Create New...