Jump to content

Radtechwxman

Members
  • Posts

    2,327
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Radtechwxman

  1. 12 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said:

    So... Mon night-Tue morning is dead and gone. Tue night-Wed morning is trending towards DOA. Wed evening-Thur morning looks good for somewhere in the area. Thur is the final potential wave, but may or may not occur, depending on how the trough and ejection evolves.

    Cluster**** as expected.


    .

    Pretty much the story of winter 2019-2020. Seems like the trend this winter is to look good in the long range then slowly fall apart as we get closer. Hoping we can get at least one decent wave out of this

  2. 6 minutes ago, janetjanet998 said:

    I have  no idea ....it will be a NOWCAST situation...but never underestimate dynamic/convective cooling

     

    and a deformation zone later

     

    if it stays all snow many people are going to be surprised

     

    My thoughts exactly. And being near rain-snow line is a good sweet spot if you stay on snow side. Lol

  3. 40 minutes ago, janetjanet998 said:

    Nice burst here now..big flakes under the heavier returns

    going to be some "uneven"  storm reports totals I think ....depending on how often one clears the snowboard to measure before it melts or compacts (every 6 hrs for some longer for others)

     

    I know you're close to where I am. What do you think of hrrr bringing the rain snow line as west as the IL River? I think it could come close but sure as west as hrrr/rap show it

  4. Just now, Hoosier said:

    The GFS is still at it with the 925 mb temp thing.  Here are the last few days of runs valid at 00z Friday.  Notice the last few runs in severe catchup mode.

    NEXLABdpdt-00Z-20200124_GFSMW_925_temp-100-100.gif.07ebffdbb23129387309a207db8dc07b.gif

    Utter trash model. Literally shows rain here from tomorrow afternoon through the rest of the event. Makes no sense. I do believe there will be rain at times but there will definitely be snow at night

  5. 0z hrrr torchy like gfs. Has rain wrapping around low all night Fri. I just don't buy that. There should be some CAA wrapping on backside of low. This first wave is definitely looking pretty paltry on radar. Wondering if precip by Gulf is disrupting moisture feed. Also looked like that first disturbance lifted more west than anticipated 

  6. 11 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

    Agree that better dynamics could be at play later on in the event. Also it's late January and not late March or April, that helps. I was thinking about the daytime vs nighttime issue and even though it's not worry about sun angle season yet, would think with such marginal BL temps, daytime might hurt if rates are too low vs same conditions at night.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     

    Totally agree with this. With an already high water content snow with low ratios marginal daytime temps will definitely favor more slush over accumulations and white rain like you said. I think best shot here will be overnight Thurs into Fri when wind direction shifts more northerly as upper low pulls east

    • Like 1
  7. GFS continues to be a torch with most snow confined to Great Lakes. Either it's going to hit a home run being the only model sniffing out warmer temps or going to look really stupid next to the rest of guidance. I do believe there will be transitions between rain and snow especially preceding the main upper low closing off. However I think once that upper low deepens and closes off that things will certainly be more snowier than gfs is depicting 

    • Like 2
  8. 12 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

    If anyone is looking closely at point and click or hourly weather graphs for this event we do have a fair amount of rain and snow mention during the day on Friday because of surface temps being as marginal as they are. Would think that at periods of lower precip rates that we could mix or flip to rain, or falling snow would not accumulate and essentially function as white rain.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     

    Definitely very marginal temps for any accumulation. However with a relatively strong closed low and the fact it will be strengthening as it passes over us, makes me think dynamics could compensate for lack of colder air. I remember this clipper a few years ago came through with very marginal temps but it was very compact and wound up. We ended up dynamically cooling to around 32-31 and efficiently accumulated snow with moderate to sometimes heavy rates. I know this isn't a clipper but made me think of how wrapped up this system is aloft

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...