Jump to content

Damage In Tolland

Members
  • Posts

    109,637
  • Joined

Everything posted by Damage In Tolland

  1. I agree. I have 3-6” for my area up thru ORH and then light rain / drizzle at 34-35 for a few hours before it ends as a period of light snow Monday night . I highly doubt any 50’s or 60 except perhaps the Cape . Climo always has these form weak secondary along coast. It’s just physics.
  2. It’s possible many areas hit 60 if warm models are correct. And then you bring all that wind down to the surface even interior
  3. 2.5 days out . I am quite sure that map will not verify . Either it’s much too low for the whole region .. or .. it’s too high. I just think that scenario there is least likely
  4. His hairs up on his property at 1400’ , but his feet are down lower on the 1050’ area
  5. Here come the Messenger shuffles after a few Mets bought the NAM ram to Buffalo
  6. If Ryans and Scooters forecasts about the NAM being right with temps near 60 and damaging winds are correct , I’ll meet you there at 1:00
  7. Why are Ryan and Scooter saying the NAM is correct? Yet normally it’s amped solutions are tossed by them. Interesting
  8. Granted it’s not much of one , but nice to see even the best of em can melt down a bit. After this cold and dry . Bitter pills
  9. What about the 3-5” glacier OTG prior to storm ? If we stay at 34.. you’d think you’d come east with some pack .
  10. Hoping that’s the case here. Still have 3.5-4” of glacier . Hoping to maintain pack
  11. You do realize that’s the weakening primary right? The secondary development that tracks along s coast helps interior stay in 30’s after thump . And that’s assuming that odd track there verified
  12. What kind of answer is that . Just issue numbers . Who cares if you’re wrong . You said today you’re not a forecaster anymore for work
  13. You have struggled immensely with this. And never actually issuing a forecast or amounts. Why can’t you just put numbers out?
×
×
  • Create New...