Jump to content

Ginx snewx

Members
  • Posts

    102,254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ginx snewx

  1. 18 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

    Sloppy white rain and some snow here.  Sell those clowns. 

    You will be surprised.  Does anyone inland not see the massive height falls and stalled CCB? Sell the GFS .I think crazy uncle Euro and GEM have the best grasp. Pretty much every ensemble member crushes you. Enjoy power loss.  

    • Like 3
  2. 4 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    We have this thing doing a blizzard loop over se MA on Thursday PM now....get that over the islands, then we can talk HECS over SNE.

    But as is...I see why the discrepancy over saying the Uk is inland....it must be doing what the EURO is....technically it is inland, but not because it's a hugger....it's doing a blizzard loop and getting captured.

    The height crash is real and it's spectacular.

  3. 2 hours ago, ORH_wxman said:

    Go back to the pre-clown map era when you have marginal temp profile….esp under 800-1000 feet  

    1. Look for 6 hourly QPF greater than 0.50”…preferably 0.75”+. The heavier the better, but 0.25 or 0.37 over 6 hours isn’t gonna cut it. That’s mostly white rain. 

    2. Look at 925 temps. Typically want -2ish or colder to avoid total slop though -1 will work if youre pounding with good snow growth aloft. 
     

    If you aren’t satisfying both of those criteria, then you’re looking at something significantly under 10:1 ratios. 
     

    Nocturnal timing for max precip can help a bit too, but it’s less significant than the two factors above. 

    ORH yellow thumpity thump

    download (2).png

    download (1).png

    download (3).png

    • Like 1
  4. 10 minutes ago, ChangeofSeasonsWX said:

    Everyone wants to keep bringing up 04/01/97 and 04/06/82, and yeah 1996-97 was a ratter until April 1st just like this season but this one just doesn't have the same dynamics as that one did, and April 1982 had a very cold airmass to work with. In terms of overall synoptics this one actually looks more similar to 03/29/70, but even that one had better dynamics to work with.

    This is a bomb. Zero doubt 

    • Like 1
  5. 23 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

    It’s been very good this season to be honest.  Numerous events the depth change has been much closer to reality with so many marginal temp events.  The 10:1 maps stacking up white rain that the depth maps got right at 4:1.

    Don't buy it as depicted.  Maybe typical April quick melt , but in storm??? . Bufkit will be better like the two footer you had

  6. 2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    They probably have better retention that the E MA CP because they don't get the marine intrusions or the DSD days....kind of the inverse on how Kev doesn't get upslope like the ORH hills because he is more of a single hill than a chain. That area of VT doesn't get the general downslope on a prevailing westerly flow like the CP does.

    24 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

    10:1 and then positive depth increase...

    ecmwf-deterministic-neng-total_snow_10to1-2383200.thumb.png.bd0175aa184fae350efc056a598e270d.png

    ecmwf-deterministic-neng-snow_depth_chg_inch-2383200.thumb.png.3c76bf87b268d20cc65808dbd0f7cc9c.png

    Depth change is always whacky

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...