Jump to content

hazwoper

Members
  • Posts

    3,409
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hazwoper

  1. not sure if Mt Holly has the ability to call for one yet. There were only a few offices that were first rolling it out based on the post someone shared earlier
  2. I notified all my Facebook friends in the area to either stay off the roads or get off them once the squall comes through. No reason to risk your life when it will pass in 30 ins
  3. that "haze" you are seeing is the squall approaching. The snow flakes will obstruct the clouds more than rain and thus the haze is what you see
  4. Folks in the C PA thread had the same concern when even over them radar showed nada. then it started dumping on them, LOL And from State College (like I said, RELAX):
  5. The radar bean was over the snow squall.. the squall was in between radar sites....
  6. Heaviest snowfall of the evening here. Driveway covered and decent coating on all surfaces. Ending shortly
  7. Of course when the 850s are well below freezing I still cant get a decent snowfall this year, LOL
  8. I am siding with the GFS on this one. It is clear from the radar returns and reports from the surface that the NAMs depiction of moisture holding off until after 20Z in SEPA is incorrect and that the GFS seems to have much better hold on the current the current conditions. If moisture held off as long as depicted on the NAM I could see the surface temps rising to the point where ptype would be an issue here. Just not seeing that right now and based on the slug of moisture coming from the SW right now the NAMs output is suspect to say the least. Time will tell......
  9. was just about to post this....GFS says NAM is out to lunch in extreme SEPA
  10. 18Z GFS says you'll cash in mid-February....what could possibly go wrong between now and then?
  11. Mt Holly's thoughts. WWA posted for most of their area Mt Holly's
  12. 2-4 isn’t watch criteria. They will lift a WWA later today.
×
×
  • Create New...