The positive snow depth map only showing 1” might be a red flag but hey if you had to make a forecast based off the NAMs you would certainly have to go 1-3” for most areas.
Yeah I guess I should have been more clear about that. Anyway, clearly the NAMs are nice little storms. Are they right? I guess we’ll see. I’m highly skeptical but hey, I guess it could happen
It wasn’t premature at all...what I said was 100% accurate. Just turns out it doesn’t matter as it’s still able to amplify enough to get us a good band of precip
I’d use extreme caution on the FV3 depiction for Sunday/Monday...I almost guarantee that’s how it won’t go down...no spacing at all between storms and rain to snow? Frontal passage basically.
It’s crazy how the models have been keying on different waves all winter. Whether it’s the complex pattern or not, the models have been kind of awful this winter. Is what it is
Disagree...this is the type of system that the NAM over exaggerates on the northern extent of a jet streak when a low is way to the south. It’s out to lunch. I wouldn’t expect anyone to do better than a coating of snow with this.
Euro and GFS combo I usually find works well. They both agree on a relatively weak, sheared out system. Gotta go that route. Friday’s dead for now. Let’s pay attention to Monday
Why would we care about flood warnings in the south? We’re talking about the modeled QPF in this forum. Real QPF was less than modeled. That’s the only point. Let’s move on now