Jump to content

WinterWxLuvr

Members
  • Posts

    29,279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WinterWxLuvr

  1. Can you tell me how to find maps like that?
  2. I agree with part of this. The jump location and path are not typical.
  3. I’m literally rolling on the floor.
  4. If that draws complaints, then I’ve entered the twilight zone
  5. Lol try to match the legend with that map. @mappy ain’t gonna give this a stamp of approval lol
  6. Love me some maps with no legend. For all I know this is a map showing when leaf out occurs in the spring. Nice colors for that
  7. But holy snow Batman, the surface features across these models at 84 hours are so classic. I think this is gonna be a good thump at the least. If we go mixed or rain so what, it’ll be a glacier a few hours later.
  8. While we wait and because everyone is here, we’ve stopped watching but what about the biblical storm that’s gonna hit the maritimes? Damn the wind with that is gonna be unreal. Look at those isobars lol
  9. Seriously though, have you ever trusted that model?
  10. Well I’m not predicting historic lol. But I’m not saying it can’t be either. Totally serious here. Many of these models are getting this thing to an absolutely classic spot. What happens after is still very much up in the air.
  11. Lol this is so close to some classic storms in the 84-102 hour time frame. This could trend really good. Was just reading some of the info @WVclimosent me on the 96 storm.
  12. I’d love to see the maps and setups leading into 1996, 2003, 2010 at about 36/48 prior. Anybody got any maps or links?
  13. Nice map. Shows the improved solution
  14. The ns sw is a little delayed and a little weaker this time. The separation between it and the closed low is more. We have a long way to go on this. Gotta believe that the reality will be different from what we are seeing.
  15. This is still evolving and I think the place it may go is toward our more classic snowstorms. The NAM and ICON are steps toward that. And if the cold air damming is more potent, even more so. That low transfers to Norfolk or the outer banks and it’s …
  16. I’m curious. If anybody had given you a map with a a 1008 low over Biloxi, a 1033 high over Iowa and a 1034 high over Lake Huron, would you not be excited?
  17. Yea and this situation for whatever reason seems very fluent. I have high hopes for all of us and do believe they are warranted.
  18. Yes but my comment was about the comparison to the NAM and it only runs to 84
  19. The ICON is definitely different. It’s low position is in line with the NAM.
×
×
  • Create New...