Jump to content

WinterWxLuvr

Members
  • Posts

    29,279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WinterWxLuvr

  1. Much better. Deeper and slower. I was using the 549 height line for reference. At 0z Friday night (Sat) it was just north of Nashville on this run and in the prior run it was just south of Huntington. That’s a big difference.
  2. $50 says the ICON on TT freezes up and doesn’t show h5 at 54-78
  3. This is an interesting post. I was looking at the North America h5 maps on the gfs earlier and something really stood out. At that range (view) when you toggled back 4,5,6 runs you couldn’t tell any real difference. Made me realize that it comes down to very small features when you’re looking at the practical weather at any specific time. So I can see a scenario where a model may score well on a large scale evaluation but poorly on the small scale that actually determines the real weather you get.
  4. We get that line to vertical .. maybe 6 hours earlier and 50-75 miles farther west … game on
  5. The key time is from about 54-66 hours. That’s gonna be the make or break on this evolution
  6. Huge jump. And the changes at h5 were fun to watch. Hold it back just a tad and sharpen it just a touch and you’ve got a big storm
  7. That one was easy to see. Watch that h5 trough angle shift about 45 degrees counterclockwise
  8. Yes. Big difference. Trough axis more vertical, much less progressive. Heights rising in front
  9. It’s sharper and deeper, but probably not enough. It is hanging back a tad also
  10. Was reading somewhere that the column is cold. That the ground temps are the only issue. If true, that would probably mean a quick transition to snow.
  11. It’s all gonna depend on that dry slot on the lee side of the mountains for us.
  12. That’s your baby. Let’s ride it and see what happens.
  13. I think 36 might be a little early. I was doing all my “looking” at about the 12z Friday time frame
×
×
  • Create New...