Jump to content

WhirlingWx

Members
  • Posts

    404
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by WhirlingWx

  1. NOW the HRRR wants to fire storms off in/near the Metroplex, so I guess we should watch for that. I remember hearing yesterday that the monster supercell that ended up going through Bryan/College Station didn't really start getting picked up by the models until only a couple hours before, so I'm wondering if the same thing happens again.

  2. 5 minutes ago, Powerball said:

    Well technically, it still shows the tiniest bit of mixed level CINH, but I've seen storms break through that easily. So it's understandable why FWD has been so ominous in their discussion, especially with the strong surface convergence from the dry line. The 3km NAM does make a valiant attempt at breaking the cap though.

    I just took a look at the HRRR's forecasted sounding where this evening's supercell in Central TX originated, and it had similar CINN values to what the HRRR's advertising for tomorrow afternoon/evening. 

    Well, yeah, I do agree. It wouldn't surprise me if we have a Wylie 2016 repeat or a cap bust at this point. Both seem well within the realm of possibility lol. Definitely is a nasty supercell pounding College Station right now, and many HRRR runs earlier showed like nothing firing up there until the storm had formed pretty much, iirc

  3. 16 minutes ago, Powerball said:

    Cap is virtually gone too.

     

    Still doesn't really convect here in the metro though (not that I want a supercell with baseball-sized hail roaring through DFW), so I'm just wondering what's up with that. Upper 80s surface temps, >4000 CAPE, and little CINH, is there something I'm missing? Of course, have to see what other CAMs say, but HRRR has been the most notorious at bombing areas with convection, so I feel like there's at least some significance in it not really showing much here for multiple runs.

    Edit: flow is pretty bleh, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to know if it's typical for that to just suppress convention entirely.

  4. 6 minutes ago, MUWX said:

    A special update to upgrade D3. Don’t see that often. 

    "AN ENHANCED RISK WAS ADDED TO PORTIONS OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA AND   CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI. A SOUTHERN STREAM MID-LEVEL   SHORTWAVE TROUGH IS FORECAST TO AMPLIFY DURING THE EVENING HOURS ON   FRIDAY ACROSS EAST TEXAS AND LOUISIANA. IN RESPONSE, THE LOW-LEVEL   JET IS EXPECTED TO INCREASE DURING THE EVENING/EARLY OVERNIGHT HOURS   ACROSS LOUISIANA AND MISSISSIPPI. THIS STRENGTHENING LOW-LEVEL JET   SHOULD INCREASE THE THREAT FOR DAMAGING WINDS AND TORNADOES DURING   THE LATE OVERNIGHT FRIDAY AND EARLY MORNING HOURS SATURDAY ACROSS   MAINLY CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI."

  5. I think this one does apply more to this sub, so I'll post it here. 150-200 m2/s2 seems like the lower-end for "strong" tornado potential, but SPC thinks something's up so I guess we'll see

    Mesoscale Discussion 0280
       NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
       0216 PM CDT Sat Mar 27 2021
    
       Areas affected...Portions of northeast TX...northern LA...and much
       of southern/central/eastern AR
    
       Concerning...Severe potential...Tornado Watch likely 
    
       Valid 271916Z - 272045Z
    
       Probability of Watch Issuance...80 percent
    
       SUMMARY...The threat for tornadoes, some of which may be strong,
       very large hail, and damaging winds will increase this afternoon.
       Tornado Watch issuance will likely be needed.
    
       DISCUSSION...The airmass across the ArkLaTex region continues to
       destabilize this afternoon, with surface temperatures generally
       reaching into the 70s and low 80s at 19Z. Rich low-level moisture
       already in place across this region combined with steep mid-level
       lapse rates of 7-8 C/km are supporting MLCAPE of 1500-2000 J/kg.
       Strong deep-layer shear of 50+ kt will easily favor discrete
       supercells with initial development. Given a lack of obvious
       large-scale forcing for ascent, the primary uncertainty is when
       robust storms will form. Best estimate is that with continued
       diurnal heating and weak low-level convergence along/south of the
       warm front, storms will probably initiate by 20-21Z as a weak
       low-level cap continues to gradually erode.
    
       Large to very large (2+ inch) hail will likely be the main threat
       with supercells initially, as low-level shear is not very strong at
       the moment. But, a low-level south-southwesterly jet should
       strengthen later this afternoon into the early evening, and tornado
       potential with any discrete storms will increase. A strong tornado
       appears possible given 150-200 m2/s2 of effective SRH by mid-evening
       if storms can remain generally discrete. An increasing threat for
       damaging winds may also eventually unfold later this evening as
       upscale growth occurs. Based on towering cumulus becoming evident on
       visible satellite imagery across AR, a Tornado Watch will likely
       need to be issued.
    • Like 2
  6. 6 minutes ago, TexMexWx said:

    The only area I've seen so far that has that "look" of violent tornado damage is closer to Greensboro, but even then it looks more like contextual damage rather than primary, more clear-cut DIs.

    Here is the scene I'm referring to: 

    https://mobile.twitter.com/GolemanChase/status/1375247349962973185

    ^ Granted, all the debris plastered across that field had to come from somewhere obviously, but I haven't seen pics of leveled houses well-built enough to earn an EF4+ rating (yet), which is my main point.

    Jeff Piotrowski also surveyed some pretty high-end stuff earlier today as well, saw things like wooden planks and maybe even a feather just embedded deep into the ground by the tornado. Very heavy tree damage along a good chunk of the path, as well.

  7. 11 minutes ago, jpeters3 said:

    I would be incredibly surprised if this one wasn't also an EF-4 (or 5).

    I have almost no doubt that it reached at least EF4 intensity, but obviously, availability of damage indicators to rate it as such is something TBD. The only area I've seen so far that has that "look" of violent tornado damage is closer to Greensboro, but even then it looks more like contextual damage rather than primary, more clear-cut DIs. BMX posted in a tweet earlier that they won't survey much of that tornado's path (which I'm sure includes a lot of places we haven't seen yet) until the weekend, and so far only got to EF1 damage near the end of the tornado's life, west of Wilsonville iirc.

  8. Just now, StormChaser4Life said:

    Looks like preliminary high end EF3 for Newnan 

    received_1410975182571398.jpeg

    Yeah, I was referring more to the Goldville - Roanoke, AL area where I recall we had another big velocity + debris sig and PDS tornado warning.

    Newnan tornado does actually remind me quite a bit of the Jefferson City, MO tornado in 2019 just by several similarities in the situations. Unfortunately seems like there was a fatality in Newnan, from a person killed by a falling tree on their home, if I remember/heard correctly.

×
×
  • Create New...