WinterWolf
-
Posts
18,135 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by WinterWolf
-
Where’s the torch? It’s 47 here…correction it’s 45 lol…sucks.
-
What a crap day here…48 with clouds and raw. Typical.
-
The crazy part is…it was off for a long time and the data is skewed, but the dumb garbage goes in the books. Not cool. Late Last September or early October when we had the warmth for a few days…they were 86 plus while here it was 76-78. 8-10 degrees off is laughable..but it went in the books. Pathetic.
-
Then you deserve to be disappointed. Although we have had a lot of tornadoes the last couple decades that did some healthy damage in SNE. So there’s that.
-
We may never know…??
-
Maybe? I don’t think so though…but who knows? Probably a New chick?
-
Thinking he is just having a kid now…the marriage thing didn’t work out.
-
Yup…they just put that stuff in there to give Ineedsnow wood. He falls for it every time lol.
-
They’re just covering their asses. That’ll change soon.
-
Agreed 100%…just used it to show the sun angle idea. 4/1/97 was a better example for sure. 10/2011 another great one.
-
That was a cery cold storm…lost nothing to latent cooling in that one. But as Tanarac said, 4/1/97 was even a better example, no where near as cold an airmass, but it didn’t matter.
-
I get that, but we’ve explained the situation.
-
I tried to explain the melting snow will latently cool the surface… so snow will quickly accumulate once that happens, if the rates are there.
-
Lmao…just take the loss. This isn’t about exercise or lifestyle. It’s about how snow accumulates proficiently even with sun angle and warm ground working against it, during moderate to heavy rates…1”/hr.
-
If you had the rates the temp would have wet bulbed down. You didn’t have the rates.
-
Yes, that’s what he’s saying…he thinks you would have needed 4-6 inch per hr rates. Cuz the ground was warm, and March sun. Lol.
-
Yes, that was a cold storm…But that doesn’t matter. October 2011 was 30-32 for alot of it. Just yesterday it was around 30 too in a lot of areas. 1997 same thing. It’s all about the rates. Doesn’t matter what time of day either.
-
Yes, exactly my point, I remember that so well October 2011. We had OCM saying it too in CT…it didn’t matter one bit…the snow stuck like there was crazy glue on the ground.
-
The great April blizzard of 82….snowed all day during the day. It doesn’t matter if the day before was literally 80 degrees…or the sun angle nonsense, we’ve proven this time and time again. The rates are all you need. April, May, October..it doesn’t matter at all.
-
Tried to tell him…he wasn’t understanding. The sad part is, there are METS out there on TV that say stupid crap like that too.
-
Well the ground doesn’t mean Jack.
-
It doesn’t matter bro…the rates are what matters. I mean c’mon..4/6/82 it accumulated to 2ft here. It’s not the ground, it’s the rates.
-
Thank you. He’s not getting it.
-
I don’t think late October during the day time is much different to be honest. The point is if you have the rates it doesn’t matter at all.
-
Nahh..not really. We saw it in October of 2011. Heavy rates and the warm ground eventually gets overcome by the melting snowflakes and eventually cools and accumulates fine. It doesn’t take long when the rates are there.
