Jump to content

dseagull

NO ACCESS TO PR/OT
  • Posts

    310
  • Joined

Posts posted by dseagull

  1. 3 minutes ago, USCG RS said:

    Because the set up is incredibly fragile. 

    A 1 hr difference in a vorticity is the entire ball game here for some folks. 

    You are likely to see this bounce back W at 18z for the NAM. It is so incredibly delicate. 

     

    Thanks.  I work in oceanic sciences and the same is true on a different spacial and temporal scale.

    • Like 2
  2. 3 minutes ago, romba said:

    Yup, the double barrel feature might be legit at this point.

     

    Just not certain why they're sending more aircraft recon for tonight's 0Z runs so late in the game....

    Because... the atmosphere and conditions are primed for extreme explosive growth over the next several hours.   This storm is likely to provide many surprises. (Both high and low busts in different regions) Many people are still working and may count the storm a bust if they see nothing when traveling home.  That is likely not to be the case... the models are pointless, mostly at this point... Real-time obs and data interpolation is.  What is scientifically gathered from this system is still useful in future events, even if it doesn't (it prob will) produce what you expect.  

    Not trying to be rude.  That is the actual answer.  Research and data collection now, helps models and scientific interpolation and predictions later...

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 2
  3. 14 minutes ago, Franklin0529 said:

    What time we expecting storm to start down the shore? 10pm?

    Would be surprised if you dont begin to see the radar blossom from south to north and begin getting event precip by 730.  Atmosphere is juiced.  Water vapor, radar, and mesos need to be the go to from this point forward.

  4. 16 minutes ago, PuraVida said:

    I know most are just snow weenies, but I also double as a wind weenie.

    Anyone else excited about freight trains overhead?

    Live for long duration coastal wind events.  They always intrigued more than tropical systems.  This wont be in my top 10 without big changes, but makes for a great storm.  Enjoy up your way. 

  5. Just now, EastonSN+ said:

    Don't look at the snow maps and banding. The location and strength of that low means more snow than what is show.

    NW areas need to keep an eye too. 

     

    Verbatim, if it begins bombing out at the benchmark or slightly inside, that precip field has to be a little underdone.  Fun run to see.  

    • Like 1
  6. 6 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

    It just seemed like a bit of a sloppy evolution with multiple lows trying to consolidate when it was our turn at the table so to speak. Boston got the finished 7-course entree, we got the cooks trying to throw things on the plates. 

     

    Thanks.  I guess my question was more about the surface depiction and how it doesnt match what you would expect based on the h5.  That's all due to chasing to the east?  

     

    And wouldn't one expect the ingested previous data to play "catch" up on the next runs?  Thanks. 

  7. 1 minute ago, USCG RS said:

    I hate to use this, but, convection chasing. This closes, shunts east towards convection and recloses. Now, of course a sloppy phase can do this, however, the model verbatim looks to be chasing. That H5 should have buried NJ to N. England. 

     

    Are the H5s just depicted poorly?  

×
×
  • Create New...