Brewbeer Posted yesterday at 11:52 AM Share Posted yesterday at 11:52 AM 12 hours ago, ChescoWx said: I have emailed them why do you believe the methodology they have employed is incorrect? is it because it results in a narrative and call for action that you oppose for unspecified reasons? can you provide some reasonable explanation even if you only have 33% of the data? that's an incredible amount of data, surely there MUST be SOMETHING systemic in the methodology you can point to that is scientifically invalid? your continued evasiveness on this issues is boring Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChescoWx Posted yesterday at 12:56 PM Share Posted yesterday at 12:56 PM 56 minutes ago, Brewbeer said: why do you believe the methodology they have employed is incorrect? is it because it results in a narrative and call for action that you oppose for unspecified reasons? can you provide some reasonable explanation even if you only have 33% of the data? that's an incredible amount of data, surely there MUST be SOMETHING systemic in the methodology you can point to that is scientifically invalid? your continued evasiveness on this issues is boring No evasiveness just want to see the deeper details and actual figures calculated that support these decades later adjustments to the raw data. I am a numbers guy by training so love digging into the supporting calculations that will support the adjustments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted yesterday at 08:51 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 08:51 PM 8 hours ago, Brewbeer said: why do you believe the methodology they have employed is incorrect? is it because it results in a narrative and call for action that you oppose for unspecified reasons? can you provide some reasonable explanation even if you only have 33% of the data? that's an incredible amount of data, surely there MUST be SOMETHING systemic in the methodology you can point to that is scientifically invalid? your continued evasiveness on this issues is boring Right, the main issue they've taken has always been that the output is not something they are a fan of. If I believed the output of a blood test I took was faulty, I'd find try to find flaws in the methods that produced the test results, not solely continuously bring up the output and say "hey that's not right" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted 22 hours ago Author Share Posted 22 hours ago 6 hours ago, bluewave said: This warm up into early November will give a boost to the fall rankings which are already around 15th warmest for our area since September 1st. It appears that Yellow Medicine County, MN (Population 11,404) is poised for a top 10 warm October. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brewbeer Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, Cobalt said: Right, the main issue they've taken has always been that the output is not something they are a fan of the science is sound, they don't need to "like" accept OR disprove anything else is delay, deny, distract; it's tiring 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted 38 minutes ago Author Share Posted 38 minutes ago 21 hours ago, Brewbeer said: the science is sound, they don't need to "like" accept OR disprove anything else is delay, deny, distract; it's tiring Exactly. The data and its results speak for themselves, for Yellow Medicine County, MN, and elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now