donsutherland1 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 A recent paper published by Nature lays out a model to better explain glaciation/de-glaciation cycles. However, some sources are misrepresenting the paper by implying that it undercuts scientific understanding of AGW. In fact, the paper makes no claims of any kind regarding AGW. The paper can be found here: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v542/n7642/full/nature21364.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chubbs Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said: A recent paper published by Nature lays out a model to better explain glaciation/de-glaciation cycles. However, some sources are misrepresenting the paper by implying that it undercuts scientific understanding of AGW. In fact, the paper makes no claims of any kind regarding AGW. The paper can be found here: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v542/n7642/full/nature21364.html Blog article covering the paper. I'd say the paper enhances scientific understanding but some can't bring themselves to acknowledge any progress in this area. https://earth-pages.co.uk/2017/02/27/odds-and-ends-about-milankovitch-and-climate-change/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted February 27, 2017 Author Share Posted February 27, 2017 3 hours ago, chubbs said: Blog article covering the paper. I'd say the paper enhances scientific understanding but some can't bring themselves to acknowledge any progress in this area. https://earth-pages.co.uk/2017/02/27/odds-and-ends-about-milankovitch-and-climate-change/ I agree. It seems to offer a nice advance in scientific understanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Frost Posted March 12, 2017 Share Posted March 12, 2017 Thanks for sharing Don - interesting exercise in assessing credibility... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.