Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,514
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    CHSVol
    Newest Member
    CHSVol
    Joined

Years of Living Dangerously


Msalgado

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It is apparent you are extremely new to the CC debate and do not know the accepted context of those graphics.

No one would want to make the Co2 increase seem larger than it is. Why bother.

The context of those graphics tells us short term changes in carbon cycle gases and if there is a sign of an increase or decrease going on.

The weekly year to year change is tremendous. 4PPM. The most recent month saw a 5.11PPM increase from two years ago and a 2.20PPM increase from a year ago.

This month is looking like a 3.00PPM+ gainer. which is large for one month but well within normal levels at this point.

We are still on track for 500PPM before 2050.

Atmospheric CO2 - Weekly Data

Mauna Loa Observatory | NOAA-ESRL Data

Week

Atmospheric CO2

April 13 - 19 2014

401.54 ppm

(last week)

April 13 - 19 2013

397.52 ppm

(1 year ago)

April 13 - 19 2004

380.67 ppm

(10 years ago)

You are correct that I am new to CC science, and I'm not really debating anything. I have seen Glenn Beck tear apart a whitehouse graph for less than that, but it's clear they are accepted by the scientific community. I just wouldn't use them msm, but since that isn't what this thread is, so I apologize for getting carried away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...