Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,679
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by brooklynwx99

  1. lol no model shows a cutter. could it get a little too close for comfort for the immediate coast, sure, but i find it highly unlikely that we see a system cut through the Apps. more likely to see suppression than a wet outcome here 

    • Like 3
    • 100% 1
    • clap 1
  2. 10 hours ago, CentralNJSnowman said:

    I'm generally a big fan of your posts, but this sentence appears to represent a bit of a blind spot.  We thought things were going to be idea in those other instances as well.  IF things develop as currently forecasted, then the pattern may be ideal...but we've seen over and over that things often don't develop as forecasted.  Until we're in relatively short range, it just doesn't seem as though the models can reliably forecast the pattern, any more than they can reliably forecast individual storms at long range.

     

    all we can use is the data we have right now. if things change, we can change our view on the pattern. right now, things look really good... we'll see what happens over the next few days. it's worth it to temper expectations but also acknowledge that there is heightened potential for a significant to even major storm around the 20th 

    • Like 3
  3. Just now, snowman19 said:

    December, 2022. February, 2024

    December 2022 had -PNA issues and Feb 2024 never really got going with the block never forming. this is inside of D10 so it's no longer pure fantasy and the PNA region is more favorable

  4. 24 minutes ago, Krs4Lfe said:

    I heard that same thing being said in March 2022, late Feb 2023, and Feb 2024. 

    the block for Feb 2024 was tenuous and it never really formed. late Feb 2023 was in March, so it could have delivered, but it was too warm. and I don't recall March 2022

    this time, the block is going to form and retrograde in an ideal location. just need to iron out the details

    • Like 1
  5. 38 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

    Rains to Maine on Euro. Too bad another perfectly-timed PV modulation  prevents another big event. 

    That 2/20 event looks awesome though, lol. 
     

    could be the one. this is a highly favorable look with the decaying block

    ecmwf-ensemble-avg-namer-z500_norm_anom-0009600.png.8b7cd4b85a9aa73b84f1731bbfc1c8f5.thumb.png.4d91425eb334118853440e51bd140513.png

    • Weenie 1
  6. 1 minute ago, bluewave said:

    That may be our best shot this winter so far of getting a decent coastal track but we would want to see it within 120 hrs.

    agreed. want to get into that D5-6 timeframe but for now, it seems as though a lot is aligning. hopefully we can pull together a thump for the NW posters with the 15-16th. unfortunate to see the confluence weaken in the worst spot

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. if this isn't anything but a highly favorable setup on the EPS then some of you are being a bit dishonest. everything is in the right spot with the decaying block over central Canada linking up with the developing +PNA

    ecmwf-ensemble-avg-namer-z500_norm_anom-0009600.thumb.png.f0edd517ef5bfdcd2bcc047a4782c528.png

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 2
  8. 8 hours ago, Allsnow said:

    The block is to far north and the pv is not south of Hudson Bay. You need that with a -pna and se ridge 

    that -PNA is early on. the 16th is when the trough fully swings through... we can see a snowfall there if the confluence is strong enough but I was just showing the block at its strongest. when it breaks down around the 20th, the pattern continues to become even more favorable

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...