Jump to content

NycStormChaser

Members
  • Posts

    2,374
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NycStormChaser

  1. It would be nice if those who hoping for more snow would refrain from chastising those who want to be realistic or perhaps even see more snow as unlikely. There is nothing wrong with wanting snow ... I think we all do to one degree or another and there is nothing wrong with having an opinion and stating it here with backup. But weather forecasting is not an exact science yet and there are always going to be those here with differing opinions because there is some subjectivity to all of this. I think it would be helpful to refrain from accusing those who don't see it as as snowy an event as being negative. In this case, it would appear that they turned out to be right. 
    It would also be nice for those who think the event is over actually waits for it to be over.

    Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1
  2. Exactly. Will there be some places that end up under a band a get a few inches? Yep. But it's 2PM. And it's looking more and more to me like if you want to accept reality, this was way overblown (probably because of the mishap last year where that major storm was underforecast in advance). And I'm not so sure the NWS has been "decent". They started out with 6"-12" north/northwest of NYC. Then 3"-6". They're still showing 5"-10" for northern Westchester. Depends upon how you define "decent".
    To Imply nws let's what happen last year affect their forecast now is horse crap to be honest. Cmon that's just not true. And people have to let the storm finish up before jumping ship.

    Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

    • Like 2
  3. More snow on the back end quicker?  I fail to understand your logic there.
    Do you mean there's more cold air around and it's drying up the front edge of the storm and the deeper cold air means more snow on the back end?  But as Long Beach Surfer said, the mid levels are warmer than they were forecast to be.
     
    Sorry. I just re read what I wrote. Yes there would be more cold air in our area.

    Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  4. Any Indication on how this will turn out for MMU? Seems like a lot of city talk here.


    .
    I think it's been mostly city talk because it's such a marginal location for this storm. Anyone north and west of the city will do great. 25 or 30 miles in either direction you'll really see an uptick in these numbers

    Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

    • Like 1
  5. I don't see any reason except for getting dry slotted why NYC won't see a solid 2 to 4 inches of snow. Watch out where ever that heavy band of snow setups as well. That area will do the best. Almost all models have it happenening but we never know the location until it's now casting time. Enjoy the first snowstorm of the season everyone. I'll be heading north to gather some photos and videos today and back to do the same in the city tomorrow.

     

    Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Weenie 1
  6. 1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

    Last year, was sort of a special case. One was dealing with a rare near-term forecasting failure. On account of the high impact of that failure, the effects of that outcome will likely continue to guide decision making for some time to come.

    During the morning of November 15, moderate snow dumped more than the anticipated amounts in both Baltimore and Washington, DC where 1.7" and 1.4" snow fell respectively. Neither city had expected more than a coating of snow.

    By late morning, heavy snow was moving into the Philadelphia region:

    Radar11152018.jpg

    By 1 pm, Philadelphia had experienced 1/4-mile visibility and 2" of snow had fallen.

    At that point, based on an absence of news reports noting significant pre-positioning of equipment and pre-treatment of roads prior to the onset of the heavy snow in the New York City area during the afternoon, either the NYC Sanitation's forecasters were largely oblivious to what was going on south of the City or the NYC Department of Sanitation was taking things too lightly. More than likely, one was dealing with a combination of those two scenarios: low forecaster and Department awareness of real-time events.

    The New York Times would report a situation that implied that New York City's leadership had been governed by the early forecasts. The newspaper reported, "Leaders in New York and New Jersey came under heavy criticism, but insisted that they had been caught off guard by the ferocity of the storm after early forecasts predicted just a dusting."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/nyregion/snowstorm-total-delays-commute.html

    Largely unaware of how things were evolving, the City was caught unprepared for what proved to be a moderate snowstorm (though record-breaking for the date).

    Around 2 pm, heavy snow pushed into midtown Manhattan. Streets were then rapidly covered by the heavy snow. By the time the storm ended, New York City had picked up a November 15 daily record 6.4" snowfall.

    In the post-mortem, the City's political leaders shifted significant blame onto commuters for clogging the streets. That happened after the heavy snow was underway. None of that takes away the reality that the City still had several hours to react to a situation that would wind up much worse than the early forecasts had its forecasters and decision makers observed what had happened in Baltimore and Washington and what was underway in Philadelphia.

     

    Not to blame commuters, but most people who turned on the morning news weather reports only saw an inch or two in the forecast. If the idea of this storm over performing could have been relayed before the morning commute then 50 percent of the cars and trucks would not have been out there. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...