Jump to content

olafminesaw

Members
  • Posts

    4,026
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About olafminesaw

  • Birthday 08/05/1995

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Greensboro NC

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It brings the arctic front in late, Eric Webb had mentioned this is a concern for East/central NC. I also noticed it is developing moisture much later/further north (in addition to bringing more moisture West/inland)
  2. RGEM and ICON start the party off significantly more amped than 18z
  3. Hard to take it seriously, it's holding the trough way back in Texas while the rest of guidance has it over the central gulf coast
  4. AI models favor this solution with the highest totals in NE NC and a sharp cutoff west of the Triangle
  5. I have a feeling that while the NW trend is our friend for now, it will become the villain before it is all said and done, at least for those East of 85
  6. Subtle improvements through 84 on the Euro I think. Hard to say yet if just noise
  7. The 12z OP was an amplified outlier to it's ensemble to some degree, so it makes sense that the op and mean split the difference and became aligned at 18z
  8. At 84 the RGEM looks good with respect to the trough orientation, but again, not quite in range
  9. Third the of weather club: toss the 84 hour NAM in the garbage and wait for the RGEM to run
  10. I thought more in line with the Euro than the GFS, but somewhere in between. Not worth dissecting the 84 hr NAM though
  11. FWIW the Euro AI looked better than the OP at 500 mb, while the GFS AI generally supports the OP GFS
  12. Ironically, unless all other models fold to the GFS, warm air aloft could be the savior of many with this system
×
×
  • Create New...