Jump to content

stormtracker

Administrators
  • Posts

    64,390
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stormtracker

  1. Yeah, out west, much more pronounced different with s/w location..it's further east than 18z
  2. Regardless of outcome, seems to be positive baby steps so far
  3. ok, differences are a bit apparent at 99...s/w is a bit more easter
  4. But yeah, at 93, it is a bit more interaction and further inland...a bit
  5. There are some slight diff. I guess I'm looking more in terms of that wave coming out and also comparing to the ICON/RGEM positionI
  6. Compared with it's own run, GFS is about the same...RGEM/ICON were a bit east at this time
  7. GFS almost identical so far...early tho
  8. It's a pretty good hit all in all and in line with my 6-10 im looking for. Ratios baby
  9. It makes it up to us, with heaviest over C VA and NC....
  10. At this point, it's the ICON and it seems decent and not gfs like...so I dunno
  11. Looks like it's gonna be close...but it's loaded
  12. Definitely, but still worried about the northern extent
  13. You serious? It may not do what we want but that H5 isn't a bad look
  14. Ji hijacked his account. ICON looks pretty decent so far. Def some interaction going on and seems like the baja energy is further east
  15. I'm not afraid to say it...it does look encouraging, but it's still the NAM
  16. Let's just weenie out and only use Kuchera maps from here on out....until it shows less snow...then switch to 10:1
  17. Imma go ahead and set my expectations to 6-10. I'm sold
  18. Not too mad at the Euro..looks like it'd def be over 6" if we made it past 144
  19. Here's the thing, nobody should put much weight in the GFS now, but I don't care how much I'm ridiculed, I'd like to see it on board if I'm being honest. People have gotta stop being binary. Me saying I wanna see it onboard doesn't mean I'm in angst over what it shows now. For me, it's just a caution and prevents me from being overly confident/hyped.
×
×
  • Create New...