Jump to content

stormtracker

Administrators
  • Posts

    63,568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stormtracker

  1. Closer to the coast...and again and again...better than 6z
  2. Argument could be made that if you look at 0z (I know, I said I wasn't anymore) and this run, the trof is sharper at 0z, but with 12z, the trof is neutral whereas with 0z at this point, it was still positively tilted. Seems like a wash, because heights are slight lower with this run
  3. Nrn stream diving in souther, TPV aligned better. Trof still positively titled just west of the MS river
  4. Still positive improvements over 6z. At this point, I'll stop with the 0z, no longer useful since it's clear that will be better than this run. Basically, relative to all 3 runs, this one can be some up as the goldilocks run. Right in the middle
  5. Northern stream better aligned, better height rises so far than 6z
  6. out to 45. It's obvious it will be better than 6z for sure.
  7. Well guys, this is it for me. 12z. IF things go down hill, I think Imma walk away for a bit. Not gonna stay here and whine and mope and shit up the thread for everyone else. So, here I am
  8. Go to bed. Not the run we were looking for vs 18z. But not a disaster
  9. Eastern side of the trof when it gets closer to us is flatter...not as sharp as 18z
  10. TPV (or whatever the big gyre thing is over NE Canada) kinda pressing a bit more, lowering heights from 18z from the northern vort
  11. So far , pretty similar except for slightly lower heights in front, but again...not fatal
  12. Looks like tail/western vort is a hair west of where it was at 18z
  13. It is indeed the proverbial step back, but not a disaster
  14. Leaves back more energy than 18z GFS. This does not appear to be the run we are looking for
×
×
  • Create New...