Jump to content

stormtracker

Administrators
  • Posts

    64,388
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stormtracker

  1. Every so slightly less ridging out front...other than that, no remarkable changes through 93
  2. Damn. They arent even close. Maybe the GFS is actually out to lunch as others have suggested
  3. Maybe the models don't have a handle on the block and the complicated pattern. -Weenie theorem 1.12
  4. H5 low centered around the IA/SD border. 0z it was down centered over central MO
  5. SFC low is northwest of the 0z position. Was in NE Mo, now it's NW IA
  6. sw in the pacific nw is gone and our s/w is a bit further norther. Surface low is in NE Nebraska
  7. Confluence, blocking is a tiny bit less, but with 0z it also looked "bad" at this timeframe before that bitch got the heavy shove south of us...I'd advise waiting to draw any conclusions at this point.
  8. Euro is different near WA state coast. 0z had the egg horizontal. Now its southern and vertical within the trof
  9. So far Euro is close to its 0z run...base of trof is a teeny tiny bit further south
  10. Differences between 6z and 12z can be readily seen now. 6z has a broader trof/sw, but again 12z less ridging better confluence out in front
  11. Positive changes in the east...confluence is better..but low still cuts up into IA now
  12. The positive here is that the ridging out front is noticeable flatter over the east, but again..seems to be countered by a stronger trof out west
  13. Well, at least Nebraska and the Dakotas are getting a nice snow storm
  14. Cosgrove is pretty bad tbh At any rate, the height rises over the east are noticeable lower, but looks like it won't make a difference
×
×
  • Create New...