Jump to content

JC-CT

Members
  • Posts

    18,191
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JC-CT

  1. It's not a huge difference, but like tip said, it's kind of a self-feeding dynamic so little changes have the potential for (relatively) outsized effects. I don't think it means much for most of us, but for those on the fringes it could.
  2. K. KCMH 062051Z 28004KT 3/4SM R28L/P6000FT -SN OVC027 M07/M11 A2997 RMK AO2 SLP160 P0000 60000 T10721106 56014
  3. Every run of the HRRR...hour 0 there's much less convection, then hour 1 POOF there it is. Wash, rinse, repeat.
  4. I like what I see on the spc meso analysis. Maybe it's weenie goggles, but it seems like every hour, short term guidance is putting too much emphasis on the lead convection. Plus, I see some very small evidence of circulation out there on the radar/satellite, but not nearly what I would have expected based on guidance from this morning. Subtle, obviously.
  5. This is what I'm watching on the nowcast...I'd be lying if I said I didn't see some interesting trends on where the low pressure is located off the SE coast right now vs modeling, and some of the short-term guidance corrections I'm watching.
  6. Granted, there was a brief period where the GFS and 12km NAM were on an island giving the whole sub less than 2", but they corrected pretty quick.
  7. Yeah, we are talking like a potential difference of 3" or so...big in the context of a projected advisory snowfall, but not so big in the macro view of things.
×
×
  • Create New...