Jump to content

JC-CT

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,191

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JC-CT

  1. JC-CT
  2. JC-CT
    plenty of time for 75 mile shifts, absolutely. that's like 36 hours when you start honing in on that
  3. JC-CT
    need to fire up that gulf stream
  4. JC-CT
    yeah, pretty small ticks. starting to lock in on ray's worst nightmare?
  5. JC-CT
    if it still does the google maps overlay, it's still a winner.
  6. JC-CT
    did we factor this in?
  7. JC-CT
    it's not. most of this subforum will enjoy its 1-3" for the third time this year. hoorah.
  8. JC-CT
    if we are talking about from when it got into range on the 6z run this morning, it was on the western edge of guidance. not at all surprising it adjusted.
  9. JC-CT
    it was the same crappy synoptic evolution but it didn't look quite as shredded with the qpf anyway
  10. JC-CT
    well anyway, by see the whole 0z suite, I really meant the 6z suite when I wake up tomorrow. Let's hope it shows lots of and maybe even a little because that would be ironic
  11. JC-CT
    it certainly kept it south, all right
  12. JC-CT
    Hint: it does better from 3 hours out.
  13. JC-CT
    How did this work out?
  14. JC-CT
    the obvious cause it that it's the NAM, and it's not reliable.
  15. JC-CT
    i will say, there's a fallacy here - the NAM has 6 hours on the "current" Euro. my point is, I'd like to see the whole 0z suite
  16. JC-CT
    and the NAM has? I love the NAM, because weenie reasons, but you gotta love it for what it is and not try to change it into the perfect girlfriend I mean weather model.
  17. JC-CT
    I can discard a single run of the NAM, absolutely - watch me. When the 0z suite is over, if it is lending support to one or more globals, then I'll bring it into the fold. By itself, it's not relevant. I've seen it be on NAM island more times than I can remember.
  18. JC-CT
    it's trying to get it's sht together...for the orcas
  19. JC-CT
    bruh, best just to not look
  20. JC-CT
    yeah not going to lie, it looks terrible. but also, it's not (yet) hugely relevant
  21. JC-CT
    never, ever, ever, has the NAM lead a cycle and completely thrown off the weenies
  22. JC-CT
    NAM with less wattage. Sad.
  23. JC-CT
    hmmm
  24. JC-CT
    I think this at least partially has something to do with the dueling lows structure...some have the main low dominant, a few have the leading vort take over, and some "melt" them together? I'm literally making stuff up here.
  25. JC-CT
    Deep
×
×
  • Create New...