Jump to content

Chicago WX

Members
  • Posts

    18,285
  • Joined

Posts posted by Chicago WX

  1. 1 hour ago, Hoosier said:

    Figuring out the exact placement of these screw zones is a bit challenging.  Assuming they are real.  Still some time to get a more filled in look I suppose but it's running out.

    Hi. Models have been very consistent in the sucker hole. IKK just happens to be pretty much locked in it. That’s why I think a Watch for here is kinda silly. It’ll be an advisory at best for the LOT CWA portions, south of I-80. North of there, different story. :mapsnow:

  2. 6z RGEM is lol. Rains to LAF. HIRES models are being ridiculous.

    FGEN plus LES will make for a nice storm for Chicago. Have to have some perspective. Alas, there will be a screw zone of sorts that gets stuck in the middle. Unfortunately I'm sitting dead center in it right now. :lol: But, I'm hoping to squeeze out 2-4", which would be a nice refresher.  

     

    • Like 1
  3. 28 minutes ago, michsnowfreak said:

    I would not call anything consensus right now. There was more of a consensus several days ago, I get a kick out of how the models can be consistent with each other far out, then as you get closer to the event they go haywire and in different directions. 6ZGFS as already corrected North from 00z as well as GEFS. Todays runs should be...interesting. 

    Consensus is in the eye of the beholder I guess. For MBY anyways, pretty clear move in the models..and not for the better. :lol:

    And IMO, the ensembles have been almost useless. Especially the EPS. Consistently too far north up until this point, but they are lower skill. Alas, storm hasn’t happened yet. We watch and wait...

    • Like 1
  4. lol, I guess I was wrong with FV3. Does some weird jumping around with the slp between 96 and 114 hours...almost looks like it jumps the slp with convection from 102-108...but still manages to drive a 999mb storm into SE Ohio. I'm punting that solution verbatim. End result would probably be more favorable for N IL, IMO.

    • Like 1
  5. 29 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

    The 12z GFS has the longest duration single snow event I've ever seen modeled here next week.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     

     

    27 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said:

    That system on the GFS next week has snow in Chicago for 2 3/4 days. 15-20” that run.

    Would put back to back big dogs in play.


    .

    Just for fun, 12z GFS 10 day total snowfall (kuchera). Congrats Hoosier...

     

    348935171_ScreenShot2019-01-15at10_57_13AM.thumb.png.61dd94fbff7343e8ec7a8061e2fe88a7.png 

    • Like 1
  6. 25 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

    Different setup but locally this reminds me of that January 2009 storm in LAF in which you painstakingly crawl your way toward a semi-respectable total.  

    Enjoy the snow.  :snowing:

    The one where IND got like 12.5”? I remember that one.

    And I’m enjoying. Out working out in it! :D

  7. 11 minutes ago, cyclone77 said:

    Looks like we're closing in on an inch here.  HRRR/RAP show over 1/2" of precip, so we look to make a run at 6".  Always nice to see things trend in the good direction in the final 12hrs instead of the opposite lol.  

    You debbed your way to 6". Congrats! ;) :D

    Radar returns crawling north around here...snow literally knocking on the back door, lol...but we are getting some flakes with whatever moves overhead. Still like somewhere in the 3-5" range for IKK... 

    • Like 1
  8. 12 minutes ago, ams30721us said:

    Yea,  looks more like the FV-3. Brings heavier totals 3-5"+ totals right to I-80 corridor.

    nam.JPG

    Painfully close for here. Alas, I’ll take 3 and change. :D

    Not a perfect match, but snowfall distribution with this one looks similar to the March 24-25, 2013 storm. SPI probably isn’t getting 18” and LAF close to a foot, but fairly similar.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...