The media doesn't usually report on the "truth" because the "truth" is often not exciting, exhilarating, threatening, or intimidating. Marketing fear to induce consumer action is what the media does best, and this is true across a variety of subject fields [climate change inclusive]. Thus, in this case, the media chooses to report on the most extreme scenario pertaining to our future climate. And ironically, even that doesn't seem to faze the majority of citizens. I'm a believer in educating people with the truth in order to get them to act, not lying or exaggerating information to induce a response. The problem is that most people are driven primarily by short term concerns, and a possibility 30+ years down the road isn't going to be at the top of their to-do list upon awakening every morning.