Jump to content

Quincy

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    6,198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Quincy

  1. Some missing pieces (in terms of severe) for the middle of next week and it's a shame. It looks like an active period may result in more heavy rainfall than anything. Although I would suspect at least a slight risk for severe thunderstorms during a couple of those days. The PW values are progged to be on the order of 2+ SDs across much of the Plains, another signal of the heavy rain potential. The Euro shows a general 2-4 inch rainfall event by the end of the week for much of the area. Considering portions of northern Texas have already seen their fair share of rain as of late, it's not's exactly welcome, at least not so soon. Although longer term trends still indicate some persistent drought conditions.

  2. I think there are some encouraging signs. Here is the 500mb mean analog pattern for mid to late May, using the top 5 analogs from the GEFS 6-10 day forecast. It actually lines up very closely to the 00/30 Euro Weeklies projection for the time period, only slightly further east (even better) with the ridge axis.
    post-533-0-56937800-1430440623_thumb.png

     

    I whipped together a quick May tornado forecast here. A little bit more cautious of an outlook than for April, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a bigger event somewhere in the second half of May.

  3. I can't be the only one getting concerned about the "jet disappearing into Canada act" (ala May 2009/2012) that seems to be a theme on MR guidance. There may be several days of semi-interesting high CAPE/low shear potential next week, and there's always a chance one of those days could emerge as more significant. But if we're talking amplified western CONUS troughing and large-scale organized threats, it seems we might be waiting until closer to mid-month, at least.

    Have to admit I'm getting a bit concerned. I'd much rather have an overall favorable pattern than a couple of days that may or may not produce.

    The trend with the ensembles has been to knock the flow relatively zonal, but with positive height anomalies and pushing the jet north later into May. Although the 00/30 EC ENS showed more West Coast troughing by day 15, the ensembles have had poor consistency and verification beyond day 10 over the past several weeks. If you believe the CFS, it also shows signs of death ridging by mid-May.

    Looking at some more data throughout today and after the Euro Weeklies come out, I'll be ready to put a May tornado outlook together.

  4. Most ensemble guidance indicates some form of western troughing developing towards the end of the first week of May (possibly with periodic shortwave ejections in advance), looks fairly promising at this time.

    It's encouraging now to see this signal prevalent on a majority of the ensemble members, of both the Euro and GFS.

     

    Finer details are a long way from being resolved, but after a momentary break in the action, we could see severe threats begin to ramp up again. (I think there is some thunderstorm potential by this Sunday/Monday, but something more significant likely holds off until later next week or the weekend that follows)

    post-533-0-21190600-1430267269_thumb.png

  5. Last call. Still somewhat unsure about the exact placement and intensity of a mesoscale band that will probably drop some 30"+ amounts, but fairly high confidence in the highest amounts from TOL-ORH-BOS with around two feet of snow there. A nail-biter for the western fringe, but I was never buying into the hefty amounts west and southwest of Danbury:

    post-533-0-43258300-1422333734_thumb.png

  6. It's looking like a relatively small area across southeastern Kansas and far northern Oklahoma will see a somewhat favorable overlap of instability, forcing and wind shear on Wednesday. With that said, as mentioned earlier, there are still some red flags that we may be looking at another underperforming setup.

    While the GFS and Euro both show a surface low near the OK/KS border Wednesday afternoon and some backing low-level winds near a quasi warm front, we're just looking at a 1002mb low. Nothing like the more dynamic systems we saw last fall. While there's some moisture, the model consensus is only for mid-60s dew-points. The GFS spitting out some dews around 70 in the warm sector is likely overdone. We're looking at a relatively broad trough with no well defined shortwave energy being focused on one area. While the upper level flow is decent and the risk area is placed on the right-front jet quad, the low and mid-level winds aren't terribly impressive either,

    A few pieces there and and a few others likely lacking. Should still be interesting, but again, over a small area and the severity of any storms may be limited by several factors. Thursday looks to have more instability, but the shear pattern becomes more perpendicular to the front. Then, the trend continues to be toward a cold front or elongated low working as the main forcing mechanism.

  7. Still need some pieces to come together better than advertised on the Euro/GFS, but can't help but think that Wednesday into Thursday of next week has some potential from Oklahoma/Kansas into the mid-Mississippi valley.

    With a fairly deep trough digging, it's going to come down to timing of shortwave energy, surface low development/placement and richness of low-level moisture. Right now, the GFS shows a marginal setup with a strung out low, while the Euro is a bit more robust and shows a nice low-level jet ramping up.

    Let's see how the forecast evolves this weekend.

  8. The NAM is advertising some 5-10 EHI values for Iowa, Minnesota, and Missouri tomorrow. That's pretty high for September!

    Both the NAM and GFS look highly impressive for northern Iowa into southern Minnesota. Some may discount the NAM based off how it has handled some severe events this season, but even the GFS is spitting out some pretty significant values. Just pull a sounding for north-central Iowa and the GFS is showing over 200 m2s-2 0-1km helicity with 40+ knots of shear and a 40+ knot LLJ. Even seeing some STP values over 6 there on the GFS. (NAM is maxed out over southern Minnesota with double digit STPs)

     

    Caveats: Capping and lack of a trigger. The GFS/NAM combo does show a subtle piece of energy swinging through southern Minnesota, but one has to imagine that the threat near and south of the IA/MA border may be minimal to cap-busted.

  9. As mentioned, the timing for Wednesday/Thursday may be a bit off, but the parameters look awfully impressive for Wednesday. If the shortwave can speed up or we can otherwise get some more forcing in, that could kick off a few monsters. Thursday is probably out of reach, unless the whole thing slowed down. As advertised, Thursday would be a relatively narrow corridor of strong instability, but the kinematic support is lacking, along with an increasingly unidirectional shear pattern.

     

    It's into weenie-range, but the GFS/Euro also show a potent shortwave across the Dakotas/upper Midwest by next Monday/Tuesday.

  10. The Euro indicates some severe risk for Sunday into Monday across the Plains and perhaps extending into the lower Missouri/upper Mississippi Valley regions. With an upper level trough digging, an increasing low-level jet and one or more surface lows developing along a front, there could be some potential. The GFS also points at an increasing threat at this time frame. A lot can change, but it's worth keeping an eye on.

  11. 00z GFS/NAM soundings are still really impressive on Wednesday afternoon/evening in (you guessed it) north central/northeast NE and south central/southeast SD with steep mid level lapse rates and strong directional shear in the lowest km. The area is very weakly capped at 21z so there should be a window for storm initiation in there, and with a well-timed shortwave impulse passing through the area, it screams a good August chasing opportunity as it looks now (who woulda thunk it) and does have several similarities to the June 16th/17th setups. It likely will come down to mesoscale placement again, but any supercell that goes up there will have good possibilities for significant severe given the parameters in place with a feed of 70 Tds along a corridor on either side of the NE/SD border.

     

    I would think that SPC has to revise that "no severe area" in the D3 with the upcoming D2. There seems to be increasing potential here.

    Some similarities to June 17th especially, at least given the slow/lazy storm motion and proximity to the NE/SD border.

     

    00z NAM and GFS are still onboard. They're actually in fairly good agreement with the severe parameters near the warm front in southeastern SD by mid to late afternoon.

    post-533-0-13117700-1408508596_thumb.gif

    Strong turning in the lowest 1-1.5km, a weakening cap and plenty of instability - assuming there's at least some clearing during the day. Both the GFS and NAM are showing >200 m2/s0-3km and >100 m2/s0-1km helicity. This combined with 30-40 knots (or more) of shear and as mentioned, there could be significant severe.

     

    I'm very interested to see the HRRR come into range. The 4km NAM simulated reflectivity shows a somewhat messy storm mode firing around 7-8 p.m. Will the window be that narrow/will initiation be that late? We'll see how the high resolution models trend.

     

    Either way, it's looking very interesting from far northeastern Nebraska into southeastern South Dakota, up to about or just north of I-90. Even the forecast soundings for KFSD look impressive with enlarged hodographs. Intriguing for any time of the year, but especially for August.

×
×
  • Create New...