Jump to content

Quincy

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    6,198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Quincy

  1. Models have also been trending toward less moisture return. HRRR had lower 60s dews reaching to I-40, while now it has CDS struggling to hold around 60F through CI time.

    Cloud-cover is finally moving out of the eastern panhandle/western Oklahoma region, at least.

    It looks like there might just be enough moisture in place by peak heating. Wind profiles stronger favor supercells, so as long as a robust updraft can form, it should go spinning into the night... or aleast for a few hours near/along the Red River. 

  2. Was it really the cap, or more of a function of less boundary layer heating and poor low-level lapse rates? I know a cap is influenced by boundary layer heating, but the models were way off. 1-2C difference in lapse rates is huge. It’s not like they progged 13C at 800mb and it was 17C.

    When I think of too much cap, I think of orphan anvils and failed CI. We had plenty of CI today, but I’m guessing bad lapse rates and meager low-level cape led to less intense parcel acceleration. Updrafts weren’t necessarily as intense as many expected. 

    Ever since that busted tornado outbreak “swarm” in Oklahoma, I’ve started taking LLLRs a lot more seriously. There is a strong correlation between higher end tornado episodes and LLLRs. Likewise, a lot of busts have junky low-level thermodynamics. 

  3. 1 minute ago, OUGrad05 said:

    A couple hours left to warm up still...

    Just ran back three runs to 15z and HRRR was progging 6.5-7 C/km LLLRs where the 18z run at hour 1 has 5.5 C/km... Definitely trending down, but there still is some time. 

  4. 17 minutes ago, WhiteoutWX said:

    12z CAMs seem to be extremely consistent with their respective 00z runs, CI/placement wise. Maybe a very slight nudge eastward with the westward edge of the CI. Going to be close for OKC metro but consensus suggests the front will be fast enough to push through before significant CI. Although the two events aren't the exact same, may be worth noting that CI occurred a little further west and was more widespread than CAMs suggested on 04/28. With stronger capping today though, I'd be more inclined to agree with the CAMs and say this should be mostly confined to east of I-35, south of I-44. 

    This. Watch temperature trends closely. HRRR is not far off as of 15z, just 1-2F too cool in parts of central OK. However, it may only take an extra degree or two of heating to break the cap. That’s what we saw happen on 4/28. 

  5. Morning storms exiting NE Oklahoma are near an effective warm front. Elevated instability exists to the NE, while most surface-based instability is SW. 

    Note that the 700mb thermal ridge is over western OK at the moment. As it shifts east, storms lift into/through Missouri and capping takes over.

    Morning storms have little to no impact on mid/late afternoon activity. Unless there’s some outflow boundary... Let’s say that scenario doesn’t reduce the severe threat. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. I don’t really have too much to add. Looks like a one-two punch. Morning/early afternoon hailers from northeastern KS into MO, then watch the front/trough unzip by 21-23z from SW MO into OK. HRRR showed some steep low-level lapse rates, but 0-3km CAPEs may be limited with southwest extent. 

    Biggest question in my mind is storm mode in Oklahoma. CAPE/shear will be there. Deep shear vectors probably favor mixed modes and a few supercells, but how long can storms stay discrete? We’ll see. 

    • Like 1
  7. A quick and dirty comparison shows some similarities to 4/28 and almost in the same area. There might be slightly longer residence time for discrete storms this go around. 

    Could have another SE to S moving tail end Charlie in the central Oklahoma vicinity.

    There’s also a signal for morning convective activity, a storm cluster or even an MCS dropping from northern Kansas toward the Ozarks. Wonder if that may shunt the front farther south and/or reintensify across Missouri.

    Currently wrapping up a chase in Nebraska. I’ll take a closer look in a couple of hours. 

  8. After tomorrow, the following seven days look very quiet and generally unfavorable for severe weather across the central states. NW flow can’t get it done this early in the season, as moisture return is usually anemic north of I-40. 

    With that said, it is common for a lull in activity that in early May. We just had the most active April since 2011, so it was bound to quiet down eventually. It’s rare to have an extended period of consistently active severe weather during the first half of spring. 

    Interestingly enough, 2011 has followed a similar tornado curve to this year. Recall that in 2011, after late April, the pattern basically shut down for two weeks. It wasn’t until mid to late May (roughly four relatively quiet weeks) that the pattern became active again. 

  9. 3 minutes ago, janetjanet998 said:

    storms so far getting destroyed with the anvils getting chopped off

     

    Mesoanalysis shows some residual capping. Kinda wish FWD had launched a special sounding, but it might have been west of the dryline anyway. It’s going to be a close call down here.

  10. Just now, Indystorm said:

    Storms now beginning to initiate se of Dallas metro

    Looks like they’re a little slow to get going, but the environment is becoming increasingly favorable. Low-level winds are backed to southeasterly downstream, although dews are still only in the upper 50s/lower 60s.

  11. Based on latest trends from obs and high-res guidance, it looks like moisture return north of the Red River will be marginal at best. Forcing near the triple point should still result in vigorous convection, but I have some doubts about the tornado threat there. I agree that East Texas (especially north) looks better with respect to moisture and instability. 

    I’m in Paris, TX and about to head south. Just came from Hugo, OK and it was overcast and gloomy there. I’m not a fan of the terrain southeast of I-30, so hopefully storms can initiate near or north of there. 

  12. Agreed with moisture concerns. Looks like mainly a severe hail threat initially. As the low-level jet strengthens and moisture return increases a bit closer to 00z, still think there is a bonafide tornado threat. Especially if the storm(s) near the triple point ride a pseudo warm front and don’t congeal into a messy blob. 

     

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...