Jump to content

NittanyWx

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    758
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NittanyWx

  1. 13 hours ago, NJwx85 said:

    Snowed moderately at my location in SE Rockland County from 8pm to 1am. Finished with about 3” before the changeover. It thumped for a good 3 hours.

    So not the 12 hours of snow 15 miles inland then?

    • Haha 1
  2. 7 minutes ago, Wxoutlooksblog said:

    I do not agree with this. It is one run cycle during which every model is somewhat flatter/further south and east and the ECMWF is only very slightly further south and east & importantly to note, slower. That slowness continues the threat into Sunday with some question marks. One is timing. There are numerous impulses of energy s/w's into the southern stream which could develop. Which one is it going to be or will it be consolidated into one? The European IMO keeps this threat in play maybe another 12 hours later.  The Euro is not bad. It holds serve.

    WX/PT

    Most of the downstream changes are a knock on effect of subtle differences occurring inside hour 72 with regard to that northern stream piece.  It's becoming a bit less theoretical today.  Still some time for it to change again, but inside 72 you tend to look at it as a bit less theoretical vs trend tracking.

    • Like 4
  3. 24 minutes ago, HVSnowLover said:

    How much qpf did it have at this time? Temps look accurate but seems the precip came in a little earlier. 

    Precip timing was fine at the 10z cycle, it has 0.1LE a little after 9 in the city and S Westchester closer to 10.  So pending SWE it could end up a bit too dry if anything. 

     

    But as far as temperatures go and the coastal front, that was handled well.

  4. 20 minutes ago, binbisso said:

     It did have its starting as snow for the 1st hour less than  .1LE  So it didn't show on the clown maps.   However the 23Z shows  .15LE falling as snow.  I started snowing here at 6:30 still snowing moderately  now a little over a 1/2 inch so far probably gonna end up with 1 to 2".  Most models had me with nada including the uk GFS RGEM, gem and  regular nam.

     

    You were repsonding to a post of mine talking about the performance of the model with the coastal front.  From there went on about how the 21Z HRRR 'showed no snow', which is just flat out wrong.  It also kept Ptype as snow through 9pm, or roughly 2 hours.

    LE may end up around 0.1", which is where the 21Z HRRR may end up underperforming.  If you would have said that, I would have agreed with you...

  5. 2 minutes ago, HVSnowLover said:

    I think its ok to acknowledge this was a little colder than modeled? I think everyone realizes this is mostly going as scheduled. 

    Depends on which model. Here's what the HRRR had this morning for right now:

    image.png.57415162824ad6ee944914a508537cdf.png

     

    I'm a big stickler on revisionist history in this field and will call it out every time.

    • Like 1
  6. 6 minutes ago, lee59 said:

    I just saw a report from Seaford long Island only about 4 miles to my southeast that it is raining. I just looked at temps in the region and south of Hempstead Tpk. route 24, temperatures are in the mid to upper 30s and apparently raining, north of the turnpike it is the low 30s and snowing.

    That gradient won't last very long.  The HRRR has been pretty good at modeling this coastal front

  7. 12 minutes ago, nycsnow said:

    Latest nam has nyc east gusting 40-50 by 10pm with a max of 70-80 during early Monday morning hours. Wild 

    I was surprised Upton kept the HWW limited to eastern areas, I think most of the Island will verify criteria.

    • Like 2
  8. Still expecting the inversion to hold for most north of the Island.  I'm a bit surprised Upton hasn't extended HWW further west as of this morning.  Think odds are pretty high of that verifying south shore and much of the Island at large.

    • Like 4
  9.  

     

    2 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

    Inland that can work. Here as soon as the SE wind starts that hope dies.

    *Far* Inland.

    Would need a major (and it should be said quite unlikely) error with the northern stream to have much impact around the major cities like he's suggesting.

  10. I dont want to speak for the guys at Mt. Holly or OKX, but I think they're waiting to see the northern stream piece sampled by our upper air network first given its importance to how far inland the low tracks.  That's the only thing I can think of at this point.

     

     

    • Like 9
×
×
  • Create New...