I actually got 8.2" that year but yeah, putrid. Interestingly enough, Harrisburg's first year of record keeping in 1888-1889 may have had a shot at being under 10" as well, but they didn't start tracking until January of 1889 so we don't know what fell in Nov or Dec of 1888. However, only 8.0" was recorded in Jan thru March of 1889, so if Nov/Dec would have come in at under 2" we'd be in business. Doubtful but who knows. The following season of 1889-1890 was also lackluster, with only 10.3". I'll leave it up to you to decide if the snow measurement techniques were up to snuff back then ha.