Jump to content

Beach Snow

Members
  • Posts

    219
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Beach Snow

  1. From DT on twitter. As much as i don’t like him he has a point. Wonder if this will cause implications for the Friday event?
  2. Also i don’t think the HRR performance is all that great past it’s normal run. Will be very telling as we get closer within each of its 18hr runs
  3. I feel like we would all be way more comfortable and confident if it was the opposite
  4. Can you post 500 vort comparison? I don’t see where it ticked SW. Toggling between current run and 6z looks like it’s further east by a hair compared to 6z
  5. I’m glad GFS came back west some and shows slight interaction between the NS and SS. However don’t we really want to see this on short range models like the NAM or HRR? Do the globals do a better job than the mesoscale models as far as upper air patterns?
  6. There is a time when that is valid but there is no way all the “reliable” models have it wrong
  7. I mean 6z NAM had over 14” IMBY and 18z is zip…none. So i would agree
  8. I’d give less credit to the NAM post from previous storm and the RGEM has been pretty consistent
  9. I agree with this statement and that this is probably a classic NE NC SE Va with some expansive precip shields N and W like typical setups. Seen this snow setup pan out with a big event every 4-5 years or so. If Mets just solely relied on models what is the point then? AKQ issued watch for 6-8 in SE Va NE NC with the afternoon package
  10. I think we need to see what RGEM will show. The RGEM is superior to the NAM
  11. I think the NAM is too amped. Not that it matters but it really didn’t handle the past storm well in its 60-84 frames
  12. Really good model consensus tonight. Seems like each model adjusted to almost the same qpf range and snowfall axis. Not to mention most appear to have the same LP placement off NC.
  13. GFS looks better throwing precip all the way back to western NC
×
×
  • Create New...